Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo

In association with the International Commission of Jurists

  • Topics ↓
    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓
    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓
    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓
    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast
  • Topics ↓

    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓

    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓

    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓

    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast

Author: Kritika Sharma

18 Nov

Curiouser and Curiouser? How the International Criminal Court Views the Legislative Role of the Assembly of States Parties: The ICC’s Decision on the Applicability of Rule 165

[Kritika Sharma is a Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law and is writing her PhD in International Criminal Law and International Institutional Law at Leiden University.] Decisions taken by the International Criminal Court (ICC) as well as its international judicial governance institution or ‘injugovin’ the Assembly of States Parties (ASP), have been...

Kritika Sharma | 0 Comments
Recent Posts
  • A rejoinder to the incidental civilian harm debate, part II: the untenability of understanding incidental as ‘knowingly and willingly’ killing civilians (no matter how many) without ‘desire’, under ICL
  • A rejoinder to the incidental civilian harm debate, part I: the untenability of understanding incidental as ‘fortuitous’ killing of civilians (no matter how many) under IHL
  • What the First Conference on Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels Means for the Duty to Co-operate
  • Unilateral Regulation Without Mirror Clauses? The Limits of the EU’s Brussels Effect in the EU–Mercosur Agreement
  • Symposium on the Global Sumud Flotilla: The Mechanics of Legal Accumulation – From the Namibia Precedent to the Sumud Flotilla

© Opinio Juris | Design by Open & Honest | In association with the International Commission of Jurists