Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo

In association with the International Commission of Jurists

  • Topics ↓
    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓
    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓
    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓
    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast
  • Topics ↓

    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓

    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓

    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓

    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast

Author: Eugénie Mérieau

09 Nov

The Indian Supreme Court against the British Misogynistic and Homophobic Colonial Legacy: A Model to Follow for Other Commonwealth Courts?

[Eugénie Mérieau is a legal consultant for the International Commission of Jurists.] In September 2018, the Indian Supreme Court invalidated, in two landmark rulings, misogynistic and homophobic laws inherited from the British Empire. On September 27, it struck down Section 497 of the Penal Code (Shine v. Union of India) criminalizing adultery, three weeks after it had annulled Art. 377 of...

Eugénie Mérieau | 0 Comments
Recent Posts
  • Minding the Gap, Properly: Conflict Classification, Protected Persons, and What the Geneva Conventions Already Require (Part II) – A Reply to Alexandria Virginski
  • Minding the Gap, Properly: Conflict Classification, Protected Persons, and What the Geneva Conventions Already Require (Part I) – A Reply to Alexandria Virginski
  • Widening the Crime, Narrowing the Machinery: What the June 2026 Amendment Record Shows About the Crimes Against Humanity Convention
  • Autonomous Weapons Systems Mini-Symposium: Beyond Yes or No – The Decisions States will Make this Year on Autonomous Weapons
  • Free Elections and “Turning Down the Noise” on Online Platforms

© Opinio Juris | Design by Open & Honest | In association with the International Commission of Jurists