Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo

In association with the International Commission of Jurists

  • Topics ↓
    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓
    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓
    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓
    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast
  • Topics ↓

    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓

    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓

    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓

    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast

Author: Anvesh Jain

07 May

Reassuring the Inviolability of Diplomatic Premises: Worrying Trends from Ecuador to Syria

[Anvesh Jain is a third-year J.D. candidate at the University of Ottawa Faculty of Law.] Last month, two events from different parts of the world signaled a worrisome erosion of one of the fundamental lineaments of international law. On April 5, after an escalating diplomatic feud, Ecuadorian police entered Mexico’s Quito embassy to apprehend former Vice President Jorge Glas. With bribery and corruption convictions looming over him, and...

Anvesh Jain | 0 Comments
Recent Posts
  • Minding the Gap, Properly: Conflict Classification, Protected Persons, and What the Geneva Conventions Already Require (Part II) – A Reply to Alexandria Virginski
  • Minding the Gap, Properly: Conflict Classification, Protected Persons, and What the Geneva Conventions Already Require (Part I) – A Reply to Alexandria Virginski
  • Widening the Crime, Narrowing the Machinery: What the June 2026 Amendment Record Shows About the Crimes Against Humanity Convention
  • Autonomous Weapons Systems Mini-Symposium: Beyond Yes or No – The Decisions States will Make this Year on Autonomous Weapons
  • Free Elections and “Turning Down the Noise” on Online Platforms

© Opinio Juris | Design by Open & Honest | In association with the International Commission of Jurists