Search: self-defense

...- with historical examples that Professor Ramsey himself injects with a bit of proportionality and necessity discussion. Could the president respond to 9-11 with an attack to prevent further attacks if he believed further attacks are imminent? Yes....for a time...provided he can identify the source of the threat and the attacks are directed at countering it. (If they were not believed imminent, he would basically be conducting a reprisal - which some folks argue still falls within the scope of self defense or preemptive self defense.) Without Congress, could he...

...as Seselj has done with his trial. Next time, I suggest that Ms. Bogue reply to what I actually said, not what she imagines -- wishes? -- I said. Kevin Jon Heller As for "Kevin, Kevin, Kevin," he or she simply regurgitates the dismissive criticism that is always leveled at defense attorneys. The criticism refutes itself: if every defense attorney took that advice, controversial defendants would receive no counsel at all. But, of course, in "Kevin, Kevin, Kevin"'s worldview, criminal defendants only deserve counsel in an "abstract" sense. That pretty...

...to the death. It was literally "Might makes right" and it was perfectly legal until the society evolved to see the absurdity of it. Self-defense, however, is not an antiquated and absurd notion, no matter what the likes of Rebecca Peters thinks. The laws that were slowly put into place were largely ineffective until the society in question saw the values of such laws. They were also simple regulations, such as laws concerning the length of the blade. The total bans on the carrying of rapiers, even though it's rather...

support for forms of self-determination short of full independence and for a principled way of ascertaining when more limited modes of self-determination are appropriate." S.J. Anaya and others have explained how this is owing to the fact that the notion of self-determination was historically forged largely in the context of the struggle against colonialism (hence self-determination was indissolubly linked to secession). Nonetheless, and as Ben suggests with regard to the Aaland Islands, "In the field of indigenous peoples' rights...international law may be coming to recognize that various forms of intrastate...

...political, economic, legal, cultural and linguistic pluralism, within the country's integrating process. Art. 2.- Given the pre-colonial existence of the original-peasant indigenous nations and peoples and their ancestral domain over their territories, their self-determination is guaranteed in the framework of the unity of the State, which consists of their right to autonomy, self-government, culture, recognition of their institutions and the consolidation of their territorial entities, according to this Constitution and the Law. Art. 3.- The Bolivian nation is conformed by the totality of Bolivian men and women, the original-peasent indigenous...

...of local manufacture. And here is further corroboration that the blockade cannot really stop Hamas from rearming. I quote from Israel Defense(April/May 2015): http://www.israeldefense.co.il/en/content/hamas-prepares-future-confrontation-restores-its-tunnels-and-rocket-stockpiles "Regarding rocket, Hamas has initiated a tremendous operation of self-production of rockets in order to fill its stockpiles. Hamas is concentrating its efforts in producing short-range rockets – that have proven effective against the "Iron Dome" during Protecting Edge, but the organization is also working on producing rockets with a range of 75 km that can reach the central district and Jerusalem, and rockets with a...

quite limited. There was little in the Siemens award itself to suggest that Argentina had much, if any, chance of convincing the committee to annul the award. Bilateral investment treaties (BITs) are famously asymmetric. They grant investors rights but not obligations, while imposing upon states obligations unaccompanied by rights. Recent cases suggest, however, that BIT tribunals are poised to recognize a defense to state BIT liability that, in effect, imposes upon investors the obligation to avoid involvement in public corruption in the course of making a treaty-protected investment. In this...

...which he says there is a risk of the case going to trial without the defense obtaining all “potentially exculpatory evidence.” ”In my view,” he wrote, “evidence we have an obligation as prosecutors and officers of the court has not been made available to the defense.” Vandeveld also wrote that he has come to accept certain facts that could favor the defense in the case, so he asked to quit the prosecutor’s office and serve out his reserve duty in Iraq or Afghanistan. He wrote that Jawad was captured at...

I also want to welcome Professor D’Amato to Opinio Juris. And, in the typical Opinio Juris fashion, I want to welcome him by immediately taking exception to some of the arguments he put forward in his inaugural post. I agree that Judge Roberts should be held responsible for the D.C. Circuit’s decision in Hamdan as much as if he had written the opinion for the Court. I simply don’t find that decision as troubling as Professor D’Amato seems to. First, I guess I don’t find the D.C. Circuit’s...

Joe Film casting is so rarely done with any logic in mind. Look at Zang Ziyi being cast in "Memoirs of a Geisha". The Japanese community was terribly offended. But Hollywood studio executives don't really care about accuracy or even political correctness. Their main goal is to fill theater seats with people, and Britney Spears will do that. Anderson I think Britney took that <a href="http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b101256_kate_winslets_prophetic_joke_holocaust.html">Kate Winslet self-spoof</a> too seriously. Anderson Oops, dunno how that hoppened. M. Gross I see no way this could possibly end in tragedy. Time Travel,...

...merely an artistic expression of Casey’s. The defense and prosecution will each present witnesses, expert testimony, and physical evidence to support their arguments. The pretrial issue involves the First Amendment’s provisions governing freedom of speech and expression. It focuses on the constitutionality of the School Violence in Video Games statute, which prohibits the possession of certain types of video games. The defense asserts that the statute is unconstitutional. First, the defense argues that video games are a form of protected expression because they contain expressive elements entitled to First Amendment...

...“inspiration” from the various “constitutional traditions common to the Member States” (as the Court puts it), the Court has begun to develop a jurisprudence of “general principles of law,” in order to redeem the EU’s self-conception as a “community based on the rule of law.” Those principles—developed by the Court sua sponte—have enabled the Court to incorporate, within “the structure and aims of the Community,” the substance of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), as well as fundamental rights protected by national constitutions. The Court must decide crucial social...