...indication of congressional intent to permit state law to preempt implemented, non-
self-executing treaty provisions but not to preempt
self-executing treaty provisions…. Because here the Convention, an implemented treaty, rather than the Convention Act, supersedes state law, the McCarran-Ferguson Act’s provision that “no Act of Congress” shall be construed to supersede state law regulating the business of insurance is inapplicable…. We find no indication from the text of the McCarran-Ferguson Act that Congress intended to signal a distinction between
self-executing and non-
self-executing-but-implemented treaties in the McCarran-Ferguson’s reverse-preemption clause. In other words,...
17.11.09
|
Roger Alford
|