appeal acquittals of Americans, so why is the
ICC any different? And, of course, there is absolutely no double-jeopardy provision that prevents different states from trying an American again and again for the same crime, while the same is not true of the
ICC, which prohibits states from trying defendants convicted or acquitted by the Court and vice-versa. To be sure, as you say, the
ICC does not have to defer uncritically to a state prosecution (although states cannot second-guess an
ICC prosecution), but that is necessary to prevent states...