Search: palestine icc

Palestine’s Application. This is because Palestine made an Article 35(2) declaration at the ICJ and referenced Security Council Resolution 9. This means that should the ICJ conclude that Palestine is a state for the purposes of its Statute, then Palestine would have access to the ICJ, and Palestine’s Application could be considered by the Court under Article I of the Optional Protocol to the VCDR to which Palestine and the U.S. are contracting parties even though that treaty entered into force after 1945, when the Statute of the Court entered...

such as the ICC would operate on the basis of a perfect symmetry between powers possessed by state parties domestically and powers conferred to the ICC to exert its functions at the international level. This is misleading and unsound. For the purposes of this intervention, the crux of the issue before the ICC revolves around whether or not the ICC may exercise its powers to investigate and prosecute international crimes committed on the territory of Palestine by Israeli nationals, notably Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defence Minister Gallant, in the event...

...an international crime in the Congo, he could be tried before the ICC, because the Congo has the right to try that person under international law, and it is a party to the ICC statute. But the Congo would not have the right to try George W. Bush, for example, for crimes allegedly committed by some of his subordinates in the Congo, because as a serving head of state he would be immune from Congolese jurisdiction. GWB would likewise be entitled to immunity before the ICC, Article 27 notwithstanding, as...

crime vs. same conduct. The ne bis in idem is addressed in this book within the context of the ICC cases arising from the situations in Africa following the specifications in Article 20 and I shall review these below. Article 20(1) embodies the intra-jurisdictional aspect of the ne bis in idem principle, as it applies within the ICC itself, barring retrial of persons already tried by the ICC. The author lays down the conditions necessary to apply this section to include a trial of a person before the ICC, a...

right. The Rome Statute is a treaty. States that have not ratified the Rome Statute have not “agreed” to anything. Because the ICC treaty specifically limits ICC involvement to cases where national legal institutions fall short, the ICC focused its attention on the latter group, which unfortunately were mostly African. In some cases, the African countries invited ICC participation, but in others it was thrust upon them. For example, the Security Council authorized the ICC to investigate Sudan, whose president Omar al-Bashir was indicted for his role in ethnic killings...

for statehood. A nice discussion of many of these criteria is found in John Quigley's The Statehood of Palestine: International Law in the Middle East Conflict (Cambridge University Press, 2010). Quigley well argues that the view that "Palestine is not a state suffers from four errors. It disregards historical facts that show Palestine statehood dating from the mandate period. It applies criteria for Palestine statehood that are more stringent than those actually followed in the international community. It fails to account for the fact that Palestine's territory is under belligerent...

year’s Gaza conflict, as some activists have called for. There is no question that ISIS is responsible for horrific international crimes that deserve to be prosecuted. But does it “certainly make more sense” for the ICC to prosecute those crimes than British torture in Iraq, US torture in Afghanistan, and Israel’s vast array of crimes against Palestinian civilians in Gaza? That’s not self-evident. Readers know my skepticism toward the ICC investigating the situation in Palestine, but the expressive value of prosecuting UK or US military commanders and political leaders for...

is with the basic premise. I could almost accept a show that gave the ICC a police force; after all, who among us doesn’t wish it had one? But I cannot accept a show that invents an ICC police force that investigates, in the words of one of the executive producers, “topical crimes and illicit global trades such as plutonium poisonings, serial killings, kidnappings, human trafficking and drug smuggling.” Indeed, the two-hour pilot has the “ICC team,” as it’s called — complete with ICC badges — investigating a serial killer...

...Prosperi, p.255). ICC jurisdiction over the crimes The crimes also appear to fall within ICC jurisdiction as conferred by the UNSC pursuant to Resolution 1970.  In her regular reporting to the UNSC, the ICC Prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, herself has indicated that serious crimes committed against migrants in Libya may fall within the Court’s jurisdiction, repeatedly affirming that her Office is investigating such crimes (see e.g. here, here, here, here, here and here). Of note, no member of the UNSC has apparently objected to such approach. The stance of the ICC...

within its armed forces. Second, under the “complementarity” regime in Article 17 of the Rome Statute, the ICC is a court of last resort. Consequently, any country can avoid ICC proceedings by conducting its own investigations and – if warranted – prosecutions. Rather than trying to obstruct the work of the ICC, the U.S. should commit to thoroughly investigating and, where justified, prosecuting cases related to torture, thereby precluding such cases from appearing on the ICC’s docket. Third, U.S. efforts to obstruct the work of the ICC have backfired in...

...of the applicability of ne bis n idem in Article 20(1) of the Rome Statute to midway terminations of proceedings. Article 20(1), to recall, bars the ICC from trying a person who has already been convicted or acquitted for the same conduct by the ICC. The specific question is whether termination of the case by the ICC without an acquittal or conviction bars future trial by the ICC of the same person for the same conduct. For example, in Ruto and Sang case the ICC declared a mistrial, while in...

deferral resolution pursuant to Art. 16 could prevent the judges from addressing the border issue. If the OTP ever did open a formal investigation into Palestine that included settlements, I have little doubt it would avoid focusing on settlements that are in disputed territory. There is enough settlement activity in areas that are indisputably part of Palestine to found a prosecution. The judges could then avoid the legal quagmire by writing something like: "however contested the borders of the state of Palestine might be, there is no question that the...