Search: palestine icc

...“The use of the term “Palestine” is historical fiction; it encourages the Palestine entity concept; its “revived usage enrages” individual Israelis”. Crawford replied “It is difficult to see how it “enrages” Israeli opinion. The practice is consistent with the fact that, ”in a de jure sense”, Jerusalem was part of Palestine and has not since become part of any other sovereignty. That it was not a simple matter, since there was a ''quota nationality'', in regard to which U.S. legislation and regulation continue to employ the term Palestine. See Foreign...

...would possess state-like characteristics in that they would have combatant immunity and Israel would need to give them, if captured, prisoner of war status so long as they complied with Article 4, Geneva Convention III. However, the elevation of a non-state group to state-like status simply by the conflict occurring in occupied territory may be problematic. While it could be supported by Article 1(4) of Additional Protocol I, to which Palestine is a party, Israel is not and the provision’s customary status is contested. Application of that provision is therefore...

moral harms that arise from sharing footage of crimes online are similar in nature to those previously recognised in ICL jurisprudence. For instance, in the recent case of Al Hassan at the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Office of the Prosecutor submitted as part of its application for an arrest warrant that the fact that videos of crimes committed by Ansar Dine were posted to YouTube contributed to a ‘sense of public humiliation’ (para. 136). Similarly, in Al-Werfalli, the ICC Pre-Trial Chamber stated in its two arrest warrants that ‘the...

to non-member-state status — retroactive effect. In my view, therefore, the 2009 declaration is effectively (and perhaps even legally) void. That conclusion is supported by Fatou Bensouda’s public statement that “the ball is now in the court of Palestine”, “Palestine has to come back,” and “we are waiting for them.” The bottom line for me is that Palestine needs to submit a new declaration accepting the ICC’s jurisdiction on an ad hoc basis. (Assuming the Palestinian Authority has the authority to do so — about which see my previous post.)...

...in the above-mentioned parliamentary debates that preceded South Africa’s decision to accede to the Apartheid Convention, the question of Palestine and the system of apartheid imposed on the people of Palestine, were explicitly mentioned as part of the rationale to accede to the Apartheid Convention.  Establishing a Special Mechanism to Combat Contemporary Forms of Apartheid  Since the suspension of the Apartheid Convention’s treaty monitoring body in 1995, the following 11 states, including South Africa, have acceded to the Convention: Azerbaijan (1996), Georgia (2005), Kyrgyzstan (1997), Montenegro (2006), Paraguay (2005), Moldova...

not name any particular courts, but it could be domestic courts that find they have jurisdiction. Importantly, it could be the International Criminal Court. The ICC Prosecutor could include evidence the commission assembles in the current investigation of crimes in the territory of Palestine. The crimes involved are not limited to those perpetrated in the recent Gaza-Israel conflict. A second innovative aspect of the resolution is that it calls for investigation not only of acts during the recent hostilities, but of the circumstances that led to those hostilities. Beyond the...

It's equally a fact that Israel has been occupying a large part of Palestine since 1948 -- the part that is called "Israel". The question of Geneva applying to the occupation isn't a matter of facts, but of law: "The Convention shall also apply to all cases of partial or total occupation of the territory of a High Contracting Party, even if the said occupation meets with no armed resistance." Palestine per se isn't a high contracting party, though Britain, Jordan and Egypt are. Geneva was signed in 1949, after...

...on the homes and lands of others, the UN General Assembly Resolution 181 adopted the partition of Palestine between Arabs and Jews in an unjust manner, which starkly contradicted the realities on the ground, particularly regarding the population distribution and land ownership of the respective communities. This was the first-ever UN resolution on the question of Palestine, the original sin that created a built-in injustice within the entire framework. It was the start of a chain of mistakes that have yet to be undone. Subsequent efforts to alleviate Palestinian suffering...

considered the adoption of such a procedure. Some of these are clearly compelled to act outside of the reporting cycle, such as the statement of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child on 13 October on grave violations of children’s rights occurring in Israel and Palestine. An EWUA procedure would provide guidelines for triggering such a mechanism, as well as documenting Committee action and recommendations via decisions, statements and letters. CERD’s Statement on Israel and the State of Palestine CERD’s Statement is addressed to both Israel and Palestine...

...and other self-determination units. On this view, Israel’s occupation constitutes a ‘continued use of force’ (para. 253) engaging the prohibition of force, while its intent to exercise permanent control engages the corollary prohibition of forcible acquisition of territory, whether Palestine is a State or a self-determination unit. Again, I don’t wish to exaggerate the practical stakes of the issue. Palestine is a State, in my view, so the problems described above may not arise. But some courts, States, and scholars may be reluctant to determine that Palestine is a State,...

...its normative standards including the protection and promotion of human rights in accordance with the African Charter. Therefore, the position of the AU should remain clear: the fact that Member states request the granting of the observer status to Israel is not an excuse for it to disregard its norms of reference. Using the granting of the observer status to Palestine as a justification seems absurd as it is Israel, not Palestine, that is carrying out apartheid policies in the Palestinian Occupied Territory. Towards a Charter-compliant Diplomacy African states must...

I will be participating next week in what should be an excellent event at George Mason University on the ICC and Palestine. The other participants are all excellent — David Luban, Meg DeGuzman, George Bisharat, and the organizer, Noura Erakat. Here is the flyer: I hope at least some Opinio Juris readers will be able to attend and hear my dire prognostications in person. (If you do, make sure to come say hello.) The event will be live-streamed for those that do not live nearby....