Search: palestine icc

staggering: A 2017 ICC Staff Union report on ‘ICC Staff Feedback on Harassment, Bullying, Discrimination and Abuse of Power’, provided the result of a survey taken by 128 ICC staff members in which 48.4% of respondents said that they had been victims of one of the listed behaviours (discrimination, (sexual) harassment, abuse of authority, or misconduct). Equally concerning was the fact that only 18.7% of those who had stated having been victims of these behaviours said that they reported them. Reasons given for deciding not to report included: lack of...

Article 17 of the ICC Statute requires the Court to determine whether “the case” is being investigated or prosecuted (Article 17(1)(a)) or has been investigated (Article 17(1)(b)). To determine whether a national proceeding concerns the same “case”, ICC jurisprudence asks whether it concerns the same person and “substantially the same conduct”. Kevin, like other scholars in recent literature, argues that the same-conduct test is too stringent. The concern is that same-conduct test “privileges the ICC instead of states” because it requires national authorities to investigate the specific conduct that the...

I don’t know quite what to make of this story from the AP of July 3, 2009: African leaders approve anti-ICC move By ALFRED de MONTESQUIOU – 9 hours ago SIRTE, Libya (AP) — African leaders have approved a contentious decision to denounce the International Criminal Court and refuse to extradite Sudan’s President Omar al-Bashir. The final decision by the African Union heads of state summit says AU members “shall not cooperate … in the arrest and transfer of the President of Sudan to the ICC.” The story adds that...

...territories of States not parties to the ICC’s Rome Statute be wholly excluded from the ICC’s jurisdiction on aggression. In 2017, France and the UK crafted an “opt-in” clause, which allowed States to elect to submit to the ICC’s jurisdiction over the crime of aggression by ratifying the Kampala amendments, whereas before that, the ICC’s jurisdiction automatically applied. Because Russia is not a party to the Rome Statute, absent a referral from the UN Security Council (which is not an option for Ukraine due to Russia’s veto power), the ICC...

already participated by giving statements, signing petitions, taking part in the ICC’s Article 15 procedure, meeting with various teams who visit the camps or having submissions filed on their behalf by their Legal Representative of Victims (“LRV”). If a trial commences, or if parties to the ICJ proceedings are granted leave to call witnesses, some individuals will appear before the courts. At the ICC, some victims may have their interests represented through their LRV. If there is a conviction at the ICC there will be sentencing hearings and reparations. Victims,...

...Koh’s words: “we have applied a pragmatic, case-by-case approach toward ICC issues.” That said, the ICC Office of the Prosecutor’s preliminary examination in Afghanistan was forever on the horizon, threatening to derail this evolution. Bolton’s recent speech to the Federalist Society has no doubt put an end to this practice of case-by-case constructive cooperation, even when legal accountability is squarely within U.S. national interests. There are many reasons that the United States should not cut ties completely with the ICC. In addition to being in a better position to protect...

[Ana Martín is a PhD Researcher at the Transitional Justice Institute , Ulster University, investigating the topic intersectionality and sexual and gender-based crimes.] The Appeals Chamber (AC) Confirmation of Jurisdiction Decision in Abd-Al-Rahman (1 November 2021) sets a substantive precedent regarding the challenging harmonization of two articles of the International Criminal Court (ICC, Court) Rome Statute (Statute): article 22 (1) establishing the principle of legality or non-retroactivity (nullum crimen sine lege) in international criminal law (ICL) and article 21(3) requiring interpreting and applying the law in consistency with international human...

...to the types of crimes delineated in the Rome Statute. Which brings one to the broader purpose of the Rome Statute – to establish a court, yes, but also surely to widen the prohibition of the crimes as described in the statute. So while the ICC is focused on ‘positive complementarity’, the wider context – the ability to prosecute international crimes in more national jurisdictions – is one that should make the ICC Prosecutor’s job more focused. Also, while positive complementarity is usually vis-à-vis state parties (or referrals), it is...

A couple of days ago, I criticized Julian’s claim that the ICC’s involvement in Darfur makes the situation there worse. I still believe that, on balance, the ICC’s involvement is positive. Nevertheless, articles like this give me pause: Aid workers fear war crimes accusations made by the International Criminal Court against two Sudanese suspects could hamper their work in Darfur and raise an added hurdle to a proposed deployment of United Nations troops. Khartoum has a long history of retaliating against international measures. These have often strengthened the hand of...

...U.S. constructive engagement with the Court. Other recent positive developments include U.S. deployment of 100 special operations forces as military advisers to Uganda to assist with the apprehension of members of the Lords Resistance Army led by Joseph Kony; statements by State Department Legal Advisor Harold H. Koh that the U.S. respects its obligations as signatory to the ICC’s Rome Statute (obligations the second Bush Administration attempted to revoke); and U.S. participation at ICC-related meetings, including meetings of the Assembly of States Parties to the ICC. During the second term...

First, the OTP reports that the African Union has apparently provided sufficient assurances of future cooperation with the ICC to alleviate earlier tensions over the ICC’s investigations concerning Darfur. Second, the Report offers the Prosecutor’s view that Sudan’s ongoing efforts to use various domestic tribunals as a means for invoking the principle of complimentarity have not convinced the ICC to back off. Specifically, the Third Report concludes: Based upon the current OTP assessments, it does not appear that the national authorities have investigated or prosecuted, or are investigating and prosecuting,...

seen the evidence are very different from the ones you refer to: the TC simply does not have the knowledge before the trial starts. Once the trial starts, the judges can really go and look for the truth, and in that process require new charges to tally with what really happened. So, the explanation for no power to modify charges before trial is very different... Alexander Not one, but two important decisions in this field have just emanated from the ICC (trial chamber V(a): http://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/situations%20and%20cases/situations/situation%20icc%200109/related%20cases/icc01090111/court%20records/chambers/tcVa/Pages/1122.aspx and appeals chamber: http://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/situations%20and%20cases/situations/situation%20icc%200109/related%20cases/icc01090111/court%20records/chambers/appeals%20chamber/Pages/1123.aspx )...