Search: palestine icc

Jess Bavin has another informative piece on the ICC in today’s WSJ, noting the warming trend of the US toward the ICC: That new approach will be on display today, when the ICC’s chief prosecutor reports to the United Nations Security Council on his investigation into alleged war crimes in Darfur. The U.S., which now considers the ICC perhaps the only chance to bring Darfur war criminals to justice, will attend the briefing. U.S. Ambassador John Bolton, for years among the ICC’s harshest critics, will send a deputy. The move...

was issued; trial began in the military commissions’ first case four years after the detainee was indicted (Hamdan). The ICC’s first sentence was 14 years; the military commissions’ first sentence was seven years, with all but nine months suspended (Hicks). The ICC has brought charges against 28 suspects; the military commissions have brought charges against 13 detainees. The ICC costs $100,000,000 per year; Guantanamo costs $150,000,000 (although some of that is obviously not chargeable against the commissions). If the ICC is absurd, what does that say about the military commissions?...

that judicial functions cannot be delegated to other bodies or officials. The Constitutional Court noted that the jurisdiction of the ICC under the Rome Statute is complementary to national judicial systems. However, under Article 4(2) of the Rome Statute, the ICC may exercise its functions and powers on the territory of any State party, and under Article 17, the ICC may find a case to be admissible if the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution. The Court concluded that jurisdiction supplementary to the...

...to the Rome Statute, the ICC sword cuts both ways. However, if the Ukrainian justice system is able and willing to investigate and prosecute such crimes, the ICC would not have to intervene. Finally, there are some misconceptions regarding the crime of aggression relating to the situation of Crimea. The ICC has no jurisdiction over this crime yet – only after 30 Member States ratify the 2010 Kampala Amendments to the Rome Statute (.pdf) , scheduled for 2017. So far only 24 states have ratified them and the Court’s jurisdiction...

because the US is not a party to the ICC. (Venezeula, of course, is). On the other hand, the writers glossed over the fact that “delivering” a high level US government official to the ICC’s front door does not equal a referral – the ICC has the power to determine whether its jurisdictional requirements are met under Arts. 12 & 13 of the Rome Statute. The other creative fiction of the show is that the ICC has an ongoing investigation into US activities (drones, torture, and rendition). In reality, the...

not party to the ICC. Of course it can. Putting aside a Security Council referral, which is the real object of Rivkin and Casey’s wrath, Article 12 of the Rome Statute gives the ICC jurisdiction over crimes committed by nationals of a non-party State on the territory of a State Party. What’s more, in 2002, the U.N.’s International Court of Justice — a separate institution from the ICC — upheld the notion that a country’s most senior officials could not be prosecuted unless it had given its consent. No, it...

notes — that the United States has openly supported; the U.S. abstained from the vote to refer the situation in Darfur. It will be interesting to see what critics of the ICC say about the referral. Conservatives in the U.S. like to complain that ICC investigations undermine peace negotiations and provide dictators with an incentive not to relinquish power; our own Julian has argued precisely that with regard to Darfur. Will they take the same position regarding Libya? And what about the African and Arab states that have so assiduously...

Snapshot of two days in the life of the ICC. On Tuesday, the ICC issued a new arrest warrant in the Libya situation — for Mahmoud al-Werfalli, a commander in the so-called Libyan National Army (LNA), which defected from the Libyan army during the revolution and is currently vying for power with the UN-backed Government of National Accord (GNA). The arrest warrant represents a new phase in the ICC’s completely unsuccessful investigation in Libya, as it is the first to focus on events that happened after the revolution. There is...

...on the silence of the ICC on the Sudan war. Media Reporting on the Israel-Palestine War For this conflict, I have chosen three major events which include:  7 October 2023 Hamas attack and Israel retaliation  The South Africa ICJ case against Israel  The ICC seeking arrest warrants for Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu and top Hamas leader 7 October 2023: Hamas Attack and Israel Retaliation Country News Reported Reporter Reported/Not Reported Kenya Citizen TV Reported  KTN News Reported  NTV Kenya Reported  South Africa News24 Reported  SABC News Reported  Daily Maverick Not...

on to say that, now that the UN General Assembly had made its determination that Palestine is a state, “the ball is now in the court of Palestine”, “Palestine has to come back” and “we are waiting for them”. While she said, unsurprisingly, that any new application would have to be considered, there was no ambiguity or suspense as to the result of the requisite consideration. It was clear that, in her eyes, ICC membership for the State of Palestine was Palestine’s for the asking. There was even a hint...

...immunity before international courts in recent years were the ICC’s findings that certain State Parties to the Rome Statute that created the ICC breached their duty of cooperation by failing to arrest Omar al-Bashir when he visited their territories.  Al-Bashir, like Putin, was at the time the sitting head of state (and head of government).  Sudan, like Russia, was not and is not a State Party to the ICC.  Putin’s visit to Mongolia and al-Bashir’s visits to several State Parties both raise the question of cooperation with the Court, but...

...but also to drive reform where this is necessary.” I note that as an ICC defence lawyer, and even though he has not practised at the ICC for five years, Khan has still represented more defendants than any other lawyer. Yet, I suggest, ‘crossing the floor’ will represent a challenge for Khan because in defending his clients, he has had cause to criticise the investigations and conduct of the very office he will now be heading up, for example in the Ruto case where he said in his opening statement...