Francisco F. Martin Although I agree with Prof. Alford that "more defendants will invoke presumptions against
extraterritoriality and/or an implied U.S. nexus requirement in future human rights and terrorism litigation" in ATS cases, I don't think that they should be successful for a couple of reasons. First, the ATS in human rights cases should be construed in conformity with the international human rights law that recognizes the
extraterritorial application of human rights norms (whether under the strict interpretation of Bankovic v. Belgium or the liberal interpretation of, e.g., Coard v....
06.08.07
|
Roger Alford
|