Search: extraterritorial sanctions

...by Resolution 60/1 that was adopted in 2025, to be reviewed in September 2026 and September 2027. In addition to the UNHRC, attention has also been directed toward the use of sanctions and accountability. These have resulted in several cases where former heads of state and military officials faced travel sanctions, resulting in them and their families being unable to travel to countries such as Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States. These and other steps at the international level have occurred when no genuine steps towards addressing accountability...

...enjoy in ‘safe havens’ around the world.  To remedy such blatant injustice, States, victim groups and practitioners are increasingly exploring opportunities to recover assets of perpetrators to be repurposed for reparations – an endeavour which has gathered increased momentum since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. For example, in 2022 Canada introduced legal reforms to enable the confiscation of funds frozen under sanctions, and their repurposing for the benefit of victims.  The EU has contemplated imposing a levy on interest made from frozen Russian assets to raise an estimated three billion...

...that an action on the basis of the procedure under Art. 265 TFEU was brought against the EU institutions for their inaction concerning Israel’s breaches of international law in the OPT. According to the applicant, the EU institutions unlawfully failed to act following its letter of 12 May 2025 in which the association requested: a) the suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement; b) the adoption of sanctions under Art. 29 TEU; c) a formal review of all co-operation activities with Israel; and d) the adoption of a clear public position,...

...4 June 2024, the US House of Representatives passed a bill to sanction ICC officials –‘the Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act‘– by a vote of 247 (including 42 Democrats) to 155. The sanctions would restrict entry into the US, revoke visas, and impose financial restrictions on anyone at the ICC involved in trying to investigate, arrest, detain or prosecute “protected persons,” or allies of the United States. It would also cover anyone who provides “financial, material or technological support” to those efforts. The bill is unlikely to pass the Senate and...

...Venezuela and Iran, to seize enemy and neutral oil tankers and institute forfeiture proceedings against them on the basis of unilateral US sanctions. The blockade issue is complicated by, first, questions over whether some of these vessels qualified as stateless, and second, that the US claims to have imposed a ‘global blockade’, rather than a geographically defined one, as required by international law (San Remo Manual, Article 94). By bringing the issue under the remit of civil forfeiture, rather than the traditional law of prize, the US makes its own...

...analogy holds at the level of effect: the veto can empty legal norms of enforceable content without ever declaring an exception. At the international level, this suggests that the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) veto power functions as a modern, institutionalized iustitium. Under the UN Charter, the Security Council is vested with primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security. Article 27(3), however, grants the five permanent members (P5) an absolute veto, allowing any single P5 state to block enforcement actions, sanctions, or military interventions under Chapter VII....

...two most distinctive features of Kelsen’s jurisprudence, namely: (1) that the nature of law is essentially tied to its use of sanctions, and (2) that the normative force of law was only explicable by reference to a non-natural transcendent fact, what Kelsen called the Grundnorm. Contra Kelsen (and Austin), Hart argued that linking law’s nature to the use of sanctions misrepresents law’s normativity; and on the second point, Hart offered an account of law and its apparent normativity in terms that were exclusively psychological and sociological–in terms of what legal...

Kenya’s Supreme Court has upheld Uhuru Kenyatta’s election as president. Although there were some riots over the weekend and five were killed, the situation in Kenya is described as calm but tense. North Korea has described its nuclear weapons program as the nation’s life, and has vowed to continue it despite the international sanctions. South Korea, meanwhile, has vowed a swift response to any provocation by the North and the US has deployed more radar-evading fighter jets. French-supported Malian forces are fighting Tuareg rebels in the north of Mali after...

...sense, this Court has rendered tenuous its ability to positively educate and influence the future of intellectual and academic discourse,” she added. The full text of the Sereno dissent can be found here: http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/october2010/10-7-17-SC_sereno.htm 8. On Monday, October 18, 2010, various Philippine national media carried the news that the Philippine Supreme Court had deliberated and decided to hold the UP Law Faculty in contempt for its Statement. Seehttp://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20101020-298693/UP-Law-faces-sanction-over-SC-plagiarism-case andhttp://www.gmanews.tv/story/203873/up-law-risks-sanctions-for-statements-on-plagiarism-mess , among others. 9. Copies of the Court’s seven-page Order were finally seen several hours ago. As will be seen from...

...would allow it to predict, to the extend feasible, potential human rights violations. As such, the duty to identify potential adverse human rights impact does not entail harm-based civil liability. It is an obligation of result, and non-compliance has certain consequences for the corporation. These can take the form of administrative sanctions/remedial action by the monitoring body established pursuant to Articles 17-18 of the Commission’s Proposal; or sanctions/ remedial action ordered by a civil court if the national civil /torts law allows for such a procedure, as is the case...

...authority to enforce the Laws of the Game in connection with the match to which he has been appointed.” Next comes the FIFA Disciplinary Code, which is an extraordinarily complex set of rules regarding everything from doping, to fan conduct, to rules against incitement to hatred. The sanctions that can be imposed are quite interesting, ranging from a warning to a stadium ban to forfeit. An entire article could be written on these obligations and the sanctions that flow from violations. Then there is the FIFA Statute, which as noted...

...a recent Senate report. A group calling itself “Official Cyber Caliphate” said it hacked the official website of national carrier Malaysia Airlines, but the airline said its data servers remained intact and passenger bookings were not affected. North Korea on Friday demanded the lifting of sanctions, imposed by South Korea after a 2010 attack on one of its naval vessels, as a condition for resuming dialogue. Europe Spain will start talks with the United States about further increasing the number of U.S. troops at an air base in the south...