Search: crossing lines

...many subjugated to torturous interrogation tactics, severe mistreatment, starvation, and death. These experiences highlighted the need for stronger protections, leading to the expansion of the Geneva Conventions after the war. today, more than 190 states have ratified the Geneva Conventions, establishing internationally recognized standards for the treatment of prisoners and other protected persons during armed conflict. The Third Geneva Convention specifically defines who qualifies as a prisoner of war (POW) and outlines the rights and protections afforded to such individuals. Article 4 extends POW status not only to members of...

[ Yulia Ioffe is a DPhil (PhD) candidate and a tutor in Public International Law at University of Oxford and Olga Bozhenko is an LL.M student in International Litigation (Public International Law) at Institute of International Relations Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University.] In February 2018, President Trump issued his Nuclear Posture Review (NPR), which was widely anticipated by the international community. It was hoped that this document would soften the US President’s previous aggressive rhetoric (including the threat of ‘total destruction of North Korea’) and bring the US...

...strictly military matters like "insubordination" which deal with military discipline but do not rise to the level of actual crimes. There are special offenses like crossing lines without uniform that are serious (capital offenses) but with peculiar limitations (once a spy returns to his own lines he is free and cannot subsequently be tried for his prior spying, a rule that would never be included for a real crime). There are also entirely normal crimes (murder, theft, rape) committed by civilians in an area of military combat or occupation. The...

...to remain in effect. The notion that convoys of civilian caravans can pass through military checkpoints and voluntarily migrate across permanent international lines of demarcation to their destinations without government intervention and assistance at every step along the way is simply ludicrous. The government of Israel has acted indirectly, through various instrumentalities, to franchise the bus lines, rail lines, and construct the network of roads and highways that connect Israel to the settlements as part of a common criminal purpose. Likewise, the Knesset has funded the construction of the settlements...

...violates international law. Is Khadr suspected of having secretly and under false pretenses passed through U.S. lines to lurk in or near an encampment of some sort? Or perhaps the United States was an occupying power at the time of the offense, such that the whole territory could be considered within U.S. lines? (I don't know the answer to this question). Benjamin Davis 1. Send him back to Canada. 2. Charge him with any crime that applies in Canada to him, if applicable. 3. Rehabilitate him. 4. Watch him very...

...least one difficult legal issue in the Syria situation that does not seem to be present in the Myanmar situation: namely, the mens rea of deportation as a crime against humanity. The actus reus of deportation has clearly been satisfied: the Assad regime has forcibly displaced civilians from areas in which they were “lawfully present,” and many of those civilians ended up crossing into Jordan to find safety. And it seems equally clear that the Assad regime intended to forcibly displace large numbers of civilians. But here is the question:...

...participating in, gathering elements, crossing the boundary or sailing from their territory for the purpose of starting or promoting civil strife; (ii) disarm and intern every rebel force crossing their boundaries; (iii) forbid the traffic in arms and war material, except when intended for the Government; and (iv) prevent the arming or equipping of any vessel seeking to favour the rebellion. Similar obligations were included in the 1911 Agreement on Internal Commotions and Neutrality, in force between Ecuador, Bolivia, Peru, Colombia, and Venezuela. In essence, no rule akin to the...

...Second, on the basis of this interpretation of RS Article 12(2)(a), PTC III (para. 62) found that: the alleged deportation of civilians across the Myanmar-Bangladesh border, which involved victims crossing that border, clearly establishes a territorial link on the basis of the actus reus of this crime (i.e. the crossing into Bangladesh by the victims’. Read together with para. 50, where PTC III endorsed that the actus reus encompasses the consequences of criminal conduct, this finding could be construed as establishing that the “crossing of borders” by victims of the...

[Antarnihita Mishra is an Assistant Professor of Law at IFIM Law School, Bengaluru, India. She has an LL.M. in International Law from South Asian University, New Delhi.] Recent data released by the UN Refugee Agency suggests that the Mediterranean, the world’s deadliest sea crossing, has become even more fatal now. Despite a fall in the number of migrants and refugees making the crossing to reach Europe, the death toll has seen a steep rise, with more than nineteen hundred reported as either dead or missing at sea in the Mediterranean...

[Melanie O’Brien is Senior Lecturer in International Law at the UWA Law School, University of Western Australia; and an affiliated researcher of the Asia-Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to Protect, University of Queensland.] Followers of Opinio Juris well know Kevin Jon Heller’s criticism of Crossing Lines and its portrayal of the ICC. I recently watched the action-comedy The Hitman’s Bodyguard, a film that includes an ICC-related storyline, and it certainly opens itself up to some well-deserved criticism about its portrayal of the ICC. The storyline of The Hitman’s Bodyguard is...

...least Crossing Lines is even more confused about the ICC’s jurisdiction, although Kevin admitted to finding this week’s episode quite interesting. Sometimes fiction can teach international lawyers something though, as Chris explored in this post on what political science fiction can bring to international law. What isn’t science fiction though is the growing market in which hackers sell computer vulnerabilities they have discovered. Chris posted about the sometimes perverse incentives to regulate this market, particularly once governments get involved. In other posts, Kevin accused the US of applying double standards...

...Turow, with fingers being pointed in all directions and the ending coming as a suitably-foreshadowed surprise. It is also worth noting that Turow’s decision to set the book at the ICC instead of the ICTY is actually quite clever. We are not in CROSSING LINES territory here. Bosnia is a member of the Court and the Roma massacre took place in 2004, so the ICC clearly has jurisdiction. More importantly, Turow is on firm ground when he explains that the ICTY considered the case but ultimately decided it did not...