Search: crossing lines

[Ozan Yildirim works as an Expert Associate in the Humanitarian Affairs Section of the Permanent Mission of Switzerland to the UN in Geneva and holds an LL.M. in International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights from the Geneva Academy] This post is written in the author’s personal capacity. When it comes to the disappearance of individuals, non-State actors around the world are increasingly implicated as perpetrators, such as in the context of human trafficking, migration, armed conflicts, as well as other situations of violence. Further noteworthy is the...

...strictly military matters like "insubordination" which deal with military discipline but do not rise to the level of actual crimes. There are special offenses like crossing lines without uniform that are serious (capital offenses) but with peculiar limitations (once a spy returns to his own lines he is free and cannot subsequently be tried for his prior spying, a rule that would never be included for a real crime). There are also entirely normal crimes (murder, theft, rape) committed by civilians in an area of military combat or occupation. The...

...to remain in effect. The notion that convoys of civilian caravans can pass through military checkpoints and voluntarily migrate across permanent international lines of demarcation to their destinations without government intervention and assistance at every step along the way is simply ludicrous. The government of Israel has acted indirectly, through various instrumentalities, to franchise the bus lines, rail lines, and construct the network of roads and highways that connect Israel to the settlements as part of a common criminal purpose. Likewise, the Knesset has funded the construction of the settlements...

...violates international law. Is Khadr suspected of having secretly and under false pretenses passed through U.S. lines to lurk in or near an encampment of some sort? Or perhaps the United States was an occupying power at the time of the offense, such that the whole territory could be considered within U.S. lines? (I don't know the answer to this question). Benjamin Davis 1. Send him back to Canada. 2. Charge him with any crime that applies in Canada to him, if applicable. 3. Rehabilitate him. 4. Watch him very...

...least one difficult legal issue in the Syria situation that does not seem to be present in the Myanmar situation: namely, the mens rea of deportation as a crime against humanity. The actus reus of deportation has clearly been satisfied: the Assad regime has forcibly displaced civilians from areas in which they were “lawfully present,” and many of those civilians ended up crossing into Jordan to find safety. And it seems equally clear that the Assad regime intended to forcibly displace large numbers of civilians. But here is the question:...

[Antarnihita Mishra is an Assistant Professor of Law at IFIM Law School, Bengaluru, India. She has an LL.M. in International Law from South Asian University, New Delhi.] Recent data released by the UN Refugee Agency suggests that the Mediterranean, the world’s deadliest sea crossing, has become even more fatal now. Despite a fall in the number of migrants and refugees making the crossing to reach Europe, the death toll has seen a steep rise, with more than nineteen hundred reported as either dead or missing at sea in the Mediterranean...

...Second, on the basis of this interpretation of RS Article 12(2)(a), PTC III (para. 62) found that: the alleged deportation of civilians across the Myanmar-Bangladesh border, which involved victims crossing that border, clearly establishes a territorial link on the basis of the actus reus of this crime (i.e. the crossing into Bangladesh by the victims’. Read together with para. 50, where PTC III endorsed that the actus reus encompasses the consequences of criminal conduct, this finding could be construed as establishing that the “crossing of borders” by victims of the...

...to investigate a situation referred to it. Kevin called on the ICC to keep its website updated, and listed four errors in the description of NBC’s upcoming series Crossing Lines on the ICC Police Unit, poignantly illustrating why outreach by the ICC itself is important to avoid a distorted public understanding of the ICC. Peter asked whether the Bangladesh Factory Safety Accord was a watershed moment in global governance, while Roger pointed out problems with the Accord’s arbitration clause. Julian put the spotlight on the confusing legal background of the...

...NYTimes also published the documents leaked by Bradley Manning. Following Bradley Manning’s conviction for espionage, Kevin corrected a common misperception about the meaning of “bad faith” in the Espionage Act. He also updated us on Libya’s latest admission that it intends not to cooperate with the ICC, and added that Libya’s representative is arguably in violation of the ICC’s Code of Professional Conduct. Kevin will not be updating us anymore on Crossing Lines though. As always, we listed events and announcements and provided weekday news wraps. Thank you to our...

...least Crossing Lines is even more confused about the ICC’s jurisdiction, although Kevin admitted to finding this week’s episode quite interesting. Sometimes fiction can teach international lawyers something though, as Chris explored in this post on what political science fiction can bring to international law. What isn’t science fiction though is the growing market in which hackers sell computer vulnerabilities they have discovered. Chris posted about the sometimes perverse incentives to regulate this market, particularly once governments get involved. In other posts, Kevin accused the US of applying double standards...

...in nicely with Peter’s post on a new sovereigntist essay in Foreign Affairs. As Peter points out, Katerina’s findings may suggest that the tide is shifting on international law. Roger reviewed Andrew Guzman’s book Overheated, following Hari Osofsky’s review last Friday. Kevin followed up on the fallout of Judge Harhoff’s letter, called NBC’s new show Crossing Lines an “ unmitigated disaster ” and was sceptical about the implications, according to John Dugard’s article, of the ASP’s President’s failure to table a letter on Palestinian statehood. He also recommended a new...

...the foreseeable future. And the Palestine investigation that Kevin mentions below is going to return the ICC to the U.S. Congress’ attention in the context of Israeli relations, which is the absolute worst context for the ICC. I would say the ICC’s only hope of US ratification one day lies in a slow cultural change. Perhaps this new NBC drama “Crossing Lines” will help. Then again, since it seems to propose that the ICC will operate with a shadowy investigative team of former cops, I wonder if this might backfire…...