subject to physical, territorial boundaries, most notable in on-going debates about which governance models best serve cyberspace (the traditional sovereign territorial model, a multistakeholder model where cyberspace is a res communis, or some sort of hybrid
approach). But, I notice similar sorts of conceptual boundary disputes in questions over what rules of international
law apply in cyberspace, with much of the existing analyses resting on analogies to pre-existing regulatory regimes. I find this “
law-by-analogy”
approach problematic, particularly when it comes to IHL and rules on the use of force. My...