Despite the title of his post, I do not read Chris Borgen as a natural
law skeptic! He accepts the existence of norms and principles that must be explained by theories other than positivism. He is just skeptical about the standard
approach to explaining the source of natural
law, namely, the use of the concept of the common good. I am concerned about that
approach, too, and for some of the same reasons as Chris. Like him, I, too, see the New Haven School taking a common good
approach that...