. decided according to the
laws of Costa Rica.” Taft was therefore not somehow crafting his own
approach to resolving this matter. Rather, he was applying the internal
law of Costa Rica in a case where the agreement giving rise to the claim expressly made that
law applicable. To be sure, Taft did not explicitly state that Costa Rican
law governed because of the language of the concession agreement; rather, he stated that “[the concession’s] validity is, as I have already said, to be determined by the
law in existence...
10.06.08
|
Mark Weisburd
|