Search: Symposium on the Functional Approach to the Law of Occupation

...automatic citizenship (much because of the Holocaust), Arabs have equal rights. So once you are a citizen of Israel, you are given the same rights as any other citizen. passer-by "Other than the Law of Return, which gives Jews an automatic citizenship (much because of the Holocaust), Arabs have equal rights" Rrrright. That is probably why in 1992 Knesset removed one line from Israeli Basic Law on Human Dignity and Liberty draft which says: 'All are equal before the law, and there shall be no discrimination on the grounds of...

...Concessions Cases. The Court eventually decided that the "state" to which those concessions had been subrogated was "Palestine", not Great Britain. Hersh Lauterpacht, Norman Bentwich, and Marjorie M. Whiteman each wrote journal articles, digests of international law, and international law reports which explained over and over again that the courts and international arbiters had long-since determined that the Mandated States, including Palestine, were persons of international law. Re: You may think and believe of course, that the Palestinians have the right to self determination, but this is rather a subjective...

Roger Alford For those who are suggesting that we improve the format or offer greater diversity of voices, can you be specific about your recommendations or constructive criticisms? Thanks. Roger Alford Michael A. Innes I stumbled upon Opinio Juris somewhat serendipitously, just before it initiated its Insta-Symposium on the Boumediene case. I thought the approach was simply excellent. As a social scientist sensitized to but not trained in problems of international law, I find that OJ fills a critical void, translating the significance of current issues for the rest of...

The Yale Journal of International Law (YJIL) is pleased to continue its partnership with Opinio Juris in our fourth online symposium (previous symposia can be found here). This Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday we will feature three Articles published by YJIL in Vol. 34, No. 2, which are available for download here. Our sincere thanks to Julian Ku and the rest of the Opinio Juris team for hosting this exciting discussion. On Monday, Evan J. Criddle (Syracuse University College of Law) and Evan Fox-Decent (McGill University Faculty of Law) will discuss...

...backlash against its attempts to prosecute Ariel Sharon — led, ironically enough, by Rumsfeld himself — ultimately led the Belgian Parliament to repeal its landmark universal jurisdiction law. That said, there is no question that Rumsfeld is not entitled to immunity from prosecution for acts of torture. However unsettled the law of immunity might be, it is at least clear that functional immunity — immunity ratione materiae — does not preclude a government official from being prosecuted for serious international crimes. The House of Lords specifically held in Pinochet #3...

these courts either assume that such arbitral panels are “international tribunals,” or focus on the fact that the arbitral tribunal has its origins in a bilateral investment treaty. Although the absence of judicial review in the investment context is even more pronounced than in private commercial arbitration, this factor has not featured in any of the decisions applying Section 1782 to investment arbitration. In short, federal courts take a functional approach in defining an “international tribunal” in the commercial arbitration context, and a formalist approach in the investment arbitration context....

the ICJ’s orders or to its international human rights obligations. Such non-compliance highlights a growing contempt for international law and legal institutions, weakens the authority of the ICJ, and threatens the rule of law and the peaceful resolution of disputes. Summarily accepting the end of Nagorno-Karabakh therefore risks legitimizing Azerbaijan’s flagrant violations of the ICJ’s orders to achieve that end. Conclusion The end of Nagorno-Karabakh (conflict and Republic), as it stands, presents a troubling precedent for international law and the norms governing State behavior. While international law provides valuable tools...

or occupation. Russian Federation is responsible for all direct losses stemming from its illegal aggression and occupation, including losses caused by its officials’ conduct connected with the invasion and occupation. This includes Russia’s armed and police forces as well as paramilitary forces under Russia’s control – this responsibility is supplementary to Russia’s responsibility under the law of war. (d) the breakdown of civil order in Ukraine during that period. It can be anticipated that some claimants who suffered property damage in Ukraine might not know or be able to prove...

...the Jordanian Act of Union of 1950. He asserts that it “must be emphasised that Palestine was not formed under belligerent occupation” and that a State “already existed before that occupation began, i.e. before 4 June 1967.” However, given that Jordan’s occupation arose from a breach of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter and considering the coercive nature of Jordanian control, the law of occupation is the only appropriate normative framework which can define Jordanian effective control of the West Bank territory between 1949 and 1967. A finding to the...

...offending state – in this case, Israel. Expulsion in the South Africa Case No member state has ever been expelled from the UN. However, the organization came very close in the case of South Africa – a case with obvious parallels to that of Israel. The direct trigger for the debate at the UN regarding the expulsion of South Africa was not only the growing international opprobrium towards South African apartheid, but also its continuing occupation of Namibia – an occupation recognized by the ICJ as unlawful, as in the...

...attention and pressure from human rights groups. One could measure how seriously nations take international law by the price they’re willing to expend to defend it in exactly those circumstances where my not be convenient. Indeed, if nations wish to talk about certain stances that they take as being strictly dictated by international law, as opposed to motivated by politics, animus or other factors, it’s important to take those stances even when it would otherwise be awkward. The characteristic of law is that it is applied across the board. In...

demonstrate the need for a fundamental shift in approach. Judge Pillard observed: ‘I agree that Atkinson and Mendaro, which remain binding law in this circuit, control this case. I write separately to note that those decisions have left the law of international organizations’ immunity in a perplexing state. I believe both cases were wrongly decided, and our circuit may wish to revisit them.’ (Appeal decision, p. 11) First, on the question whether the FSIA’s restrictive doctrine of State immunity should also apply to IOs, preferring the approach taken by the...