Search: Symposium on the Functional Approach to the Law of Occupation

for disruption. And indeed, the examples of teachers who challenge traditional international law structures and authorities are ample and inspiring. To name just some examples: the earlier mentioned symposium on Critical Pedagogy, the many cool critical/feminist/TWAIL oriented international law syllabi shared on Twitter (for example the Open Syllabus on Public International Law created by the International Law and the Global South blog), Christine Schwöbel’s work on teaching international law (see for example this thread on her work on decolonializing the curriculum), and the experimental Moot Court project initiated by her...

to the world if Sollen/Ought. The latter world is characterized by validity, not existence. This characteristic defines the legal order of international law as a normative phenomenon. Realists are wrong in trying to reduce law merely to a social phenomenon, be they apologists who reduce international law to what States actually do and cherish it as such, or nihilist critics who reject law as a mere extension of politics. Law, including international law, is a normative order with a quest for coherence. The practice of international law certainly is, as...

...resolutions as part of the “national interest” inquiry, but that related only indirectly and partially to international law.) However, as indicated below, and unlike the international law perspective, this runs the risk of offering an incomplete analysis even as to the domestic law perspective. For those opining about both international law and U.S. domestic law, the ground is treacherous. The safer course, usually, is simply to assume for purposes of discussion that the legal constraints are independent and potentially sufficient. Thus, for example, John Bellinger (via Lawfare) states that legality...

...use force; (2) the CIA’s understanding of whether/how international law constrains its actions. Domestic authority. Preston correctly explains that the CIA must have some source of authority under domestic U.S. law to carry out “hypothetical” activities involving the use of force abroad. In this inquiry, of course, international law is irrelevant. And I don’t read Preston to suggest that international law can give the U.S. government powers it does not otherwise possess under our own Constitution and laws. So what gives the CIA its authority to carry out drone strikes?...

...soft law is highly debated, with some academics even denying the notion itself portraying it as redundant and illogical, soft law could be considered as “a convenient description for a variety of non-binding normatively worded instruments used in contemporary international relations by States and international organizations”. Examples of soft law include recommendations, guidelines, codes of conduct, non-binding resolutions, and standards. In contrast, hard law refers to legally binding instruments, which in international law typically take the form of treaties. Soft and hard law present both advantages and disadvantages. Soft law...

other critical traditions offer them a language and framework through which they can articulate what they really thought about the limits and potentials of international law.     This was the first time public international law was offered as a course at GU-Q. I designed it in a way I assume other professors of critical international law would.  We began with the origins, concepts, and principles such as sovereignty, state responsibility, and enforcement and continued with sub-fields such as humanitarian law, human rights law, and criminal law. Next, we delved into critical...

of an audience of lawyers, I will let that question speak for itself. The upshot is that challenges to international law are not merely a matter of souring on multilateralism, or a new spin on old concerns about international law’s legitimacy or democracy deficits.[xii] Rather, international law is getting caught up in what seem to be broader patterns of disdain for the ideals of the rule of law – generality, equality before the law, even-handedness of its application, and subjection of government to law. Obviously, these are ideals that even...

of international law influence the development of international investment law, but also vice versa, changes in investment law have an impact on the evolution of other fields of international law. As the majority of publications focuses on the application and interpretation of investment protection standards, the interaction of international investment law with other sub-fields of international law has not been so extensively explored yet. To fill this gap, academics and practitioners contributing to this collection examine specific links between investment law and such other rules of international law. In particular,...

...You state that "the conduct-regulating rule under the statute comes from international law." But while the rule may come from international law, under the court's analysis its recognition implicates the lawmaking authority of the federal courts. Right? The Court's maneuver was to treat the recognition of the conduct-regulating rule as an elaboration of federal common law, albeit one that "comes from" international law (to what degree? that is an ongoing question). It then analogized federal common lawmaking to statutory law. I am not arguing whether it was correct to apply...

...this general suggestion, I would just make one exception: any talk of "war" is liable to lead lawyers to assume that the relevant law is that of armed conflict, when it may not be. [The same lawyer might then think that the relevant international law is only that of armed conflict, notably international humanitarian law, to the exclusion of human rights law. It hardly bears pointing out that that is completely fallacious.] P.S. O'Donnell Thanks Tobias: You gave legal form to my layman's intuitions. HowardGilbert The Security Council agreed that...

...19th Cent, an IAC in today's parlance) and that conflict was further internationalized with use of combat forces by the U.S. and, thereafter, several other states. Saudi combat operations have internationalized the insurgency/belligerency in this instance. But whether or not a blockade is generally permissible, other international law must be complied with -- e.g., any relevant laws of war, human rights law, other international criminal law such as that regarding crimes against humanity. Lotus?? The actual case involved nonuse of the Turkish victim theory or passive nationality theory in the...

does not inspire confidence for the future of constitutional comparativism. Unlike in Makwanyane, the Court all but ignored comparative law and severely discounted the importance of international law. It recognized that while there is no international law support for gay marriage, neither does international law expressly prohibit it. “[W]hile it is true that international law expressly protects heterosexual marriage, it is not true that it does so in a way that necessarily excludes equal recognition being given now or in the future to the right of same-sex couples…” (para. 105)....