applied concurrently with greater precision; and that international
lawyers should consider whether the values that underwrite a “humanized” IHL and international human rights
law alike should ever countenance limited exceptions to the axiom (e.g., in cases of humanitarian intervention or “transformative
occupation”). Above all, my hope is that the article, for all its f
laws, will help to revive a dialogue about the appropriate relationship between the traditional branches of the
law of war in the twenty-first century—for these issues have been conspicuously (and, I think, dangerously) absent from that dialogue....
10.04.09
|
Robert Sloane
|