Search: Symposium on the Functional Approach to the Law of Occupation

[Laura Dickinson is the Oswald Symister Colclough Research Professor of Law at George Washington University Law School.] In International Law in the Trump Administration, Harold Hongju Koh has articulated a bold vision of the role that international law can play (and to some extent is playing) during the current administration. Unlike some critics, he does not argue that the administration is inevitably destined to completely abandon or ignore all international law frameworks, although he does express serious concerns that Trump policies may seek to undermine or dismantle important international institutions...

...take what they say with a grain of salt. Their decisions are surely evidence of the law, but not law. Scholars and diplomats often pick and choose what they like from them and dismiss the rest because often their analysis, particularly of customary international law, is so weak and cherrypicked. IHL and IHRL complementarity is an area ripe for such picking and choosing because it is assumed to be the law, not demonstrated to be the law by careful treaty interpretation or thorough analysis of state practice (and opinio juris)....

rights law: it is just a statement that human rights law is different from international law. International law had to do with supporting states, whereas human rights see states as the enemy. The 1960s also saw the very robust and complex emergence of trade law, first in the GATT, then in the World Trade Organisation. So trade lawyers are people who move about in the context of trade and the globe. But justice and the good life is mostly created in the context of smaller communities, like states and often...

refer to US law or domestic law more generally in their account of the enforcement of international law. That standpoint needs to be justified if it is used to develop a conception of law that is ‘paradigmatic of all instances of law in the modern world’ (345). More generally, there are well-known methodological dangers in devising a concept of law in the light of current legal circumstances. The concept’s necessary normative and critical function becomes difficult to justify. These are classical jurisprudential problems but they become even more sensitive when...

...on the article I promised to showcase in this post. How do and how should professors of international law teach their subject? What do we say to students motivated by anti-colonial struggle? Do Black lives matter… in international law? I deliberately posed a ‘should’ question to force myself to reflect on the normative implications of whichever approach we select. Scholars of municipal law have long debated the politics of pedagogy, whether through the lens of the tactical—Socratic, problem-based, or flipped classroom models—or the political: doctrinal, critical, or feminist approaches. Publicists are latecomers...

Nor does it mean that legal education is generally better in the US than in other countries. I am also skeptical of Rob’s belief that foreign law students represent a vast and largely untapped market for American law schools. His point about the greater value of a JD on the international market is well taken; my law school, Melbourne, recently shifted to a JD-only model precisely in order to maximize the international marketability of our law graduates. I also agree that a graduate law degree can be a significant draw...

idiosyncratic; as law schools start to move away from uniform aspirations, a case could be made that certain law schools should become more focused on international law by virtue of their history, geography, or market placement at the same time as other law schools’ circumstances make the case for devoting less attention to international law. What do readers think? Is there any hope for someone trying to get a U.S. law teaching job in international law in 2014-15? Are there alternative places candidates should look if, in fact, U.S. law...

processes used to enforce international law. The Nexus Between Unlawful Israeli Occupation and Aggression: Revisiting the ICJ’s Findings The ICJ’s advisory opinion on the unlawfulness of Israeli occupation of Palestine presents a compelling case for recognising this occupation as an act of aggression. The Court emphasised that occupation inherently involves the continuous use of force in foreign territory, governed by jus ad bellum-the body of international law that governs the legality of the use of force. This conclusion is critical. Under the United Nations General Assembly’s (UNGA) definition of aggression...

Etienne Henry Dear Mr Ku, I have recently been writing a paper on related questions so I think I am in a position to provide you some useful information. 1. It is, to my knowledge, recognized that law and politics are non exclusive categories (already see, e.g., Hans Morgenthau, « The Machiavellian Utopia », AJIL 55, 1945, p. 145). Therefore it is pointless to pretend that claiming that a political argument is supported by law would undermine the law. Claiming that the settlements are lawful or unlawful is a legal...

the State to which they belong from individual or State responsibility under international law. Consequently, personal self-defence cannot be left purely to domestic law. The difficulty with the latter position is that it proves too much: broad claims of a right to personal self-defence cannot be derived from the jus ad bellum or from international human rights law. This is not to suggest that robust action defensive action has no legal basis in international law. Nothing prevents a State from relying on the law of armed conflict to authorize the...

narrower understanding of the crime for the purposes of domestic law (just like many states define other international crimes differently at domestic law as compared to international law) or they could be seen as persistent objectors. The STL’s approach to custom is not “poorly understood by academia.” On the contrary, scholars understand it all too well — which is why they have almost uniformly rejected it. Put simply, the decision is profoundly methodologically confused, as Manuel’s own summary of its analysis confirms. The problem is the “common elements” approach itself....

expect foreign ministry lawyers who deal regularly with diplomats to approach potential sources of precedent differently from military lawyers embedded within the military chain of command. We might expect international criminal law lawyers with one foot in domestic criminal law to approach issues differently from military lawyers. And we might expect private commercial law lawyers, government lawyers, and public international lawyers to value different sources of authority in investment arbitration. Alternatively, we might want to look at different actors’ social and political capital or incentives. How is success in their...