a new U.S. security relationship with Iraq. The United States has long used political – or, non-legally binding – commitments as alternatives to its treaties, but the Executive’s authority to do so is un-theorized. And, although international
law and international relations literature have studied political commitments extensively, conventional wisdom simply assumes that because they are not international
law, they are irrelevant to domestic
law as well. This paper challenges such views. We contend that the Constitution regulates the President’s ability to form political commitments and provide a comprehensive constitutional analysis...