Search: Symposium on the Functional Approach to the Law of Occupation

(CIL) confers immunity on foreign officials from lawsuits alleging human rights violations. Instead, the Justices instructed U.S. courts to determine the immunity of foreign officials under the “common law”—the legal regime that prevailed prior to the FSIA’s adoption. Notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s inattention to the international law backdrop to the Samantar case, I fully agree with Professor Wuerth that CIL is relevant to how U.S. courts should develop the common law of foreign official immunity. I also agree that a return to the pre-FSIA immunity regime should not be understood...

...enemies, than that is a plain violation and probably an impeachable offense. But there is nothing like that even alleged so far. The functional problem, though, is how to interpret and cabin the AUMF to keep it from being a blank check to the President. I agree this is a problem, although not an insurmountable one. Congress can obviously amend the AUMF or even withdraw it. It can amend the FISA to plainly prohibit the President’s activities here. I just don’t think Congress has spoken plainly here (whatever Tom Daschle...

...posted some observations on what private lawyers can bring to public international law. Here is another example. If there’s one thing that private attorneys have been grappling with in recent years (especially in the U.S., which takes financial transparency particularly seriously), it is the elucidation of best practices for financial accounting, disclosures, and decision-making. Some of the insights we have gained due to recent corporate scandals can be put to use in the service of building better international organizations. The U.N. will only be as good as we make it....

...targeting decisions more efficient with the help of automated and AI technologies. One prominent illustration of this trend is the “Algorithmic Warfare Cross-Functional Team”, also called Project Maven. Launched in 2017, Project Maven aimed at analyzing substantial volumes of video footage collected by US drones via machine learning algorithms. Currently run by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA), it now integrates various types of data presented in the Maven Smart System interface, which then highlights potential targets based on Maven’s data analysis and extrapolation.  The Ukrainian Armed Forces are employing several...

...sue the New York Police / State Dept. for illegal confinement, torture, negative publicity, aiding and abetting in illegal immigration to the USA; and misinterpretation of the law to harass an Indian diplomat. Other Things that India should do to the US for targeting Indian Diplomats - as this is now a TREND in USA. 1. Find US officials guilty of breaking laws in India and prosecute them - the way they prosecute Indians in USA for apparently breaking US laws. 2. Removal of security barriers is a FIRST step....

and fertilizer supply. Based on the International Law Commission’s most recent work on General Principles as Source of International Law, this article argues that the prohibition of abusing a dominant position qualifies as General Principle. General Principles of International Law In his First Report on General Principles of Law, the ILC’s special Rapporteur Marcelo Vázquez-Bermúdez concluded that there are two types of General Principles in the sense of Article 38 (1) (c) ICJ-Statute. They can either be derived from national legal systems or formed within the international legal system. The...

[Eian Katz is a Legal and Policy Analyst at Canmore Company. He previously served as Counsel at Public International Law and Policy Group.] Earlier this month, the Oxford Institute for Ethics, Law and Armed Conflict (ELAC) released a statement on “The Regulation of Information Operations and Activities,” marking an important step in the global effort to reckon with the implications for international law of disruptive forms of online speech. The Oxford Statement takes a very broad understanding of “information operation[s] and activities”—“any coordinated or individual deployment of digital resources for...

was a ‘radical change from previous versions’ of the IHR, moving from a passive approach relying on a list of diseases and strict national measures to a fluid, more interconnected approach. Under the IHR 2005, the ‘WHO plays a central role in surveillance, risk assessment and response and aims at ensuring an effective but proportional public health response to avoid unnecessary interference with traffic and trade’. WHO Member States are obligated to cooperate in good faith with each other and the WHO in detection, notification, and taking measures in response...

...in domestic courts. As the U.S. Brief explains, the Vienna Convention is “self-executing” in the sense that federal and state government officials already hold the power (without additional legislation from Congress) to enforce the treaty’s terms. No judicial enforcement by private individuals is necessarily required or permitted. (3) The Optional Protocol granting jurisdiction to the ICJ to interpret the Vienna Convention does not grant ICJ judgments the status as domestically enforceable law. This is an argument emphasized by the Law Professors’ Brief and the U.S. Brief. And I believe it...

...winners. The final design will be chosen in 2010 and the building should be completed by 2014. I would vote for the third-place design, because I appreciate its Eisenman/Gehry-like feel. The second-place design is boring and ugly and reminds me of the equally boring and ugly UN (sorry, Le Corbusier — at least you have the excuse that you designed the building in the late 40s). The first-place design is nice and seems very functional, but it’s much less interesting than the third-place one. Readers? Which one would you select?...

to promote compliance with international humanitarian law through its relations with the rest of the world’ based on the obligations set forth in Article 3(5) of the Treaty on the European Union, which stipulates the values upon which the EU is founded (principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law). ’ The Chatham House paper outlines the many benefits of accountability to multiple stakeholders. The Sweet Spot: Legitimacy at the Intersection of Transparency, Accountability and the Rule of Law Many of the...

of certain rights to terrorist suspects that are nonnegotiable in a civilian context. While public opinion data is nuanced, the Bush administration’s supposed menace to civil liberties and human rights has not had traction as an electoral issue; to the contrary, its opponents in Congress have feared electoral retribution for hampering the fight. For prevailing opinion in the academy, the press, and the human rights world, however, the standards of international humanitarian law represent moral absolutes, the administration’s flexible approach to them an affront to the rule of law, and...