Search: Symposium on the Functional Approach to the Law of Occupation

brought to a judge (24 hours in Israeli domestic law, compared with 8 days under military orders), or the maximum period of detention without access to a lawyer (48 hours under Israeli domestic law, against 90 days under the military orders). The legal discriminations are then aggravated by the unequal law enforcement policies. Organizations denouncing settlers’ violence against Palestinians, for example, have reported that – in ten years of activity – 85.3% of the investigations have been closed due the failure to locate suspects or to collect sufficient evidence; just...

[Dr Ming-Sung Kuo is an associate professor of law at University of Warwick (UK) where he has taught international law, constitutional and administrative law, and legal theory. He earned his JSD and LLM from Yale University and his LLB and another master degree from National Taiwan University.] In Professor Lung-Chu Chen’s recent post on Opinio Juris, he reiterates his justification of Taiwan’s statehood, which I first heard when I was still a senior law student at National Taiwan University. In this brief note, I aim to point out why Professor...

legal measures that could be taken to hold those responsible to account, informed debates at the United Nations War Crimes Commission, founded in October 1943. Representatives of the Polish War Crimes Office (created in November 1943) were cognisant of the pre-UNWCC discussions about war crimes, which had taken place in a range of unofficial fora, and had taken part in the Polish Government’s deliberations in 1942 and early 1943 on the draft Polish law relating to war crimes. That law, the ‘Decree of the President of the Republic of Poland...

...the need to abandon views that “reduc[e] the history of international law to a Völkerrechtsgeschichte der Opfer” – a History of international law of victims. “Postcolonial scholarship”, he argues, “usually places the South American legal space as part of the history of the abusers”. According to him, “nineteenth-century South American republics are studied with respect to the topic of the ‘unequal treaties’ that were forced on them by imperial powers under the legitimation of the ‘standard of civilization’, with international law appearing mainly as Medium der Befreiung in a decolonization...

who are practicing colonialism and apartheid in the Palestinian territories, as the findings of a recent report by The Human Sciences Research Council of South Africa (HSRC) make clear, summarized here by Valentina Azarov of the International Law Observer: The HSRC commissioned an international team of scholars and practitioners of international public law from South Africa, the United Kingdom, Israel and the West Bank to conduct the study. The resulting 300-page draft, titled ‘Occupation, Colonialism, Apartheid?: A re-assessment of Israel’s practices in the occupied Palestinian territories under international law’, represents...

...deals with the competence and applicable law of international tribunals. Similar to the above-mentioned approach of the Tribunal in analyzing customary law, the judges further identified a formation of custom in international law with regard to the determination of tribunals’ own jurisdiction (competence de la competence/ Kompetenz-Kompetenz [para 43 of the decision]). Though scholars like Milanovic disagreed with this decision, it served as a fruitful input in the discussion regarding the inherent powers of international tribunals. Accordingly, even if the judgment of the STL does not seem likely to settle...

16 February 2022 concerning the conditionality mechanism and the rule of law. The Court establishes that the member states have first agreed on their common values and subsequently applied these values to their organisation. This legal observation not only strokes with the historical development of the EU from a union of democratic states to a European democracy but also embodies an entirely new conceptual approach to the process of international cooperation between States. It refutes the Westphalian assumption that the EU should either become a state or an organisation of...

that it had the legal right to do so. Here are para. 6 and fn. 14: 6. The Prosecution has carefully considered whether it would be appropriate to raise such matters directly with the Appeals Chamber under article 82(1)(a) of the Statute. While it is of the view that such an approach could be sustainable as a matter of law, it is attentive in the present case to the views expressed by various members of the Pre-Trial Chamber that proceeding under article 82(1)(d) would be appropriate. It also considers that,...

...the Chamber does not have the information necessary to analyse the circumstances in which each of the individual documents was supplied to the prosecution, the overall picture is clear: the prosecution’s general approach has been to use Article 54(3)(e) to obtain a wide range of materials under the cloak of confidentiality, in order to identify from those materials evidence to be used at trial (having obtained the information provider’s consent). This is the exact opposite of the proper use of the provision, which is, exceptionally, to allow the prosecution to...

successfully pursue human rights claims arising abroad by invoking state tort law. Consider a claim subject to the conflicts methodology used in California, known as comparative impairment. Although comparative impairment is among the more nuanced and sophisticated of modern conflicts methodologies, it is also persistently biased toward forum law. For example, before a California court will even consider the possibility of applying foreign law, the party advocating for the application of such law must demonstrate that foreign law materially differs from California law and that the foreign jurisdiction has an...

memory is) is that "nothing is more injurous to law and order than passing laws that one cannot or will not uphold." Any case study of the League of Nations or of Geneva IV would have realized it. The simple fact of the matter is that one could sign into international canon a law that none shall inflict bodily harm upon another or ont hemselves. Just don't be surprised when none- even if it were to obtain a few signatures- follow it. Simply put, just as outlawing bodily harm will...

[Jennifer Trahan is Associate Clinical Professor, at The Center for Global Affairs, NYU-SPS, and Chair of the American Branch of the International Law Association’s International Criminal Court Committee. The views expressed are those of the author.] Postings on Opinio Juris seem fairly squarely against the legality of the U.S. missile strike last week into Syria. Let me join Jens David Ohlin (blogging on Opinio Juris) and Harold Koh (blogging on Just Security) in making the contrary case. When NATO intervened in Kosovo in 1999, member states did not have UN...