...the most to lose if it accepts a broad
approach to extraterritorial application since it is exerting its power extraterritorially all the time, and the least to lose by resisting such constraints, i.e. it can afford to buck the trend more easily than, say, a state subject to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights. Similarly, because human rights
law is not directly applicable within US domestic
law, it is unlikely that US courts will push the government to change its position on the extraterritorial application of human...