Search: Symposium on the Functional Approach to the Law of Occupation

of the Draft Conclusions. Or perhaps the Court felt that the circumstances of the case required a more flexible approach than the methodology prescribed in the Draft Conclusions? At this point, it is important to briefly discuss the reaction of States to the Draft Conclusions and how it squares with the Court’s methodology. Several delegations in the discussions held in the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly reiterated the two-element approach to ascertaining customary international law. They called for a rigorous methodology to ascertain customary international law so that it...

of terrorism and the challenge of crafting laws to address it. Ben has a nice turn of phrase describing the need for the president to work with Congress in forging an appropriate legal framework: “One can still make a theoretical argument for an executive-only approach to problems like global terrorism. In practice, however, the argument is an unreal dream.” I would rewrite the sentence as to read: “One can still make a theoretical argument for a U.S.-only approach to problems like global terrorism. In practice, however, the argument is an...

[Mark Nevitt is an Associate Professor at Syracuse University College of Law and affiliated faculty with Syracuse University’s Institute for Security Policy & Law and a former lawyer in the United States Navy.]    Is the climate-security century upon us?  If so, what are the implications for international legal governance and institutions?  In his recent Opinio Juris essay, based on his provocative and meticulously researched article, Atmospheric Intervention , Professor Martin argues that the climate change crisis may well exert pressure for change on the governing jus ad bellum regime....

the terms of a United Nations Security Council Resolution that authorizes the use of force..." in certain respects. A NEW point -- a reporter "told" me by email that when Harold Koh, for example, was asked whether it would be a "war" crime if a drone operator deliberately targeted civilian, the answer was yes because under int'l law the laws of war apply to this U.S. use of force. Don't we use such international law as background for interpreting a federal statute (or joint resolution)? The Charming Betsy, U.S. 1804....

the most legitimate measures to against a recalcitrant state, and presents an opportunity to strengthen the effectiveness of the sanctions regime as a matter of law. Considering the politics within the Security Council, however, this approach might be the most difficult measure to implement, as the acquiescence of all five permanent Members are required. Russia and China have protected North Korea in the past and likely will not approve such an approach. Moreover, Russia and China already have weakened presidential statements in this regard. A second approach is to conduct...

...remedy for victims of human rights violations caused by business activities. Human rights’ due diligence principle is a critical element of this “responsibility”. However, the UNGPs bear critical flaws and have failed to fill the accountability gap in this field adequately. First, they are not legally binding. Secondly, they do not impose explicit human rights duties on businesses. Last but not least, some states have shown reluctance to adopt the due diligence principle in their domestic laws. Powerful countries and conservative multinational corporations are still promoting a ‘voluntary obligations approach’...

‘end of history’ Western liberal frame. Some readers who seek to slot ICC literature into a for-or-against dyad might be tempted read this as countering the rule of law movement narrative with a kind of pro-immunity apologism, but this would be missing the important work of critique, which ‘resists evaluating international criminal law in terms of success or failure, but instead asks about its underlying presumptions and conditions of possibility’ (Kendall 2014, Chapter 2). Critical approaches and third world approaches to international law – and specifically international criminal law –...

...Prosecutor Khan stressed the importance of the principle of complementarity. He thus sent a clear message to states: during his mandate, he would defer to genuine domestic proceedings and stand ready to engage with national authorities in “novel and imaginative ways”, wherever possible, to make inroads in the fight against impunity within situation countries. Following through on his approach, Prosecutor Khan subsequently found that “complementarity is working today in Colombia”. Hence, he decided to conclude the lengthiest Preliminary Examination (“PE”) in the history of the ICC. This decision may have...

...jurisprudence. Most obviously, it is much narrower than the approach PTC III took in the Burundi situation. The Burundi PTC — which included Judge Mindua! — explicitly held that the OTP could investigate any crime that fell within the authorization request’s temporal parameters: 193. With regard to the material scope of the authorized investigation, the Chamber authorizes the commencement of an investigation of any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court committed between 26 April 2015 and 26 October 2017, subject to what is said in the previous paragraph on...

Kenneth Anderson I am obliged by Home Team Spirit to point out that this address was delivered as the keynote at the American University Law Review annual symposium, this year on piracy, and featuring a stellar lineup, including Ruth Wedgwood and many others. You can check it all out at: http://www.wcl.american.edu/secle/founders/2010/documents/033110TroubledWaters.pdf?rd=1 Eugene Kontorovich Certainly a promising idea, one first broached in the ASIL-ACUNS-One Earth Future piracy conference Julian mentioned recently. https://opiniojuris.org/2010/02/11/experts-release-report-explaining-that-international-law-can-help-suppress-piracy/ I'm working on a longer piece on the subject....

[Reece Lewis is Lecturer in Law at Cardiff University.] This year marks 40 years since the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) was opened for signature. This landmark provides an opportunity to reflect on its achievements and challenges it faces today. Leading the way is the Report by the UK House of Lords International Relations and Defence Select Committee, entitled “UNCLOS: the Law of the Sea in the 21st Century”—published 1 March 2022. The Inquiry sought to examine whether UNCLOS remains fit for purpose in the...

...the most to lose if it accepts a broad approach to extraterritorial application since it is exerting its power extraterritorially all the time, and the least to lose by resisting such constraints, i.e. it can afford to buck the trend more easily than, say, a state subject to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights. Similarly, because human rights law is not directly applicable within US domestic law, it is unlikely that US courts will push the government to change its position on the extraterritorial application of human...