Search: Complementarity SAIF GADDAFI

...an excellent discussion of the inter-jurisdictional ne bis in idem rules in Article 20 (2) and (3) of the Rome Statute of the ICC. Dr. Iryna Marchuk, University of Copenhagen, and Dr. Aloka Wanigasuriya, University of Southern Denmark, investigate a topical issue of interaction between ne bis in idem and the principle of complementarity in the context of domestic prosecution of war crimes committed in Ukraine. Dr. Daniel R. Ruhweza of Makerere University in Uganda provides an insightful overview of challenges arising in connection with the application of ne bis...

...for victims in judicial assistance proceedings (Part VI). The Convention is therefore ambitious in its efforts to bolster the ICC complementarity regime and close the loopholes which have enabled perpetrators of international crimes to evade justice in the past. While the ICC Statute’s silence on the obligations of states to enact implementing legislation led to much debate in academic circles, there is no such ambiguity in the Ljubljana-The Hague Convention. In terms of cooperation, which forms the most substantial component of the Treaty and was the impetus behind it, the...

...He placed the blame squarely on three individuals: Sam Shoamanesh, the chef de cabinet to the ICC Prosecutor, Phakiso Mochochoko, the head of jurisdiction, complementarity and cooperation division and the Prosecutor herself, Fatou Bensouda. The USA’s contention with the ICC also stemmed from the Prosecutor’s intention to investigate international crimes allegedly committed in the State of Palestine, which potentially implicates citizens of Israel, a long-time ally of the USA. Two months later, then-President of the USA Donald Trump issued Executive Order 13928, which sought to block the properties of certain...

Last year, as I was reading an early draft of the agenda for the ICC’s Review Conference in 2010, I asked myself what I would change about the Rome Statute if I was King of the Assembly of States Parties. My answer was that I would amend Article 17, the complementarity provision, to make a case admissible if a national proceeding did not provide the defendant with due process — an issue I had written about before. (You can find the essay here, if you’re interested.) I then wondered what...

...not meant for hearing cases of genocide. But somewhere in the process of retrofitting it for mass atrocity, gacaca appears to have lost its core restorative justice defining qualities. In my upcoming article “Complementarity and Alternative Justice” (to be published in the Oregon Law Review), I explore this dilemma in greater depth. I still believe that there is hope for successfully using traditional alternative justice mechanisms to deal with gross human rights violations. For that, a better calibrated hybridization will be necessary. Posterity may not ultimately view gacaca as the...

...activity during war. (In the case of the UK trial, they are doing so in accordance with the complementarity provisions of the ICC statute.) By additionally compensating victims for criminal killings and for those in which no criminal charges are brought, we convey a sense of responsibility and remorse in terms that are culturally understood. But better to “refresh” training so that fewer mistakes are made in the first place. In the case of detainees, as I argued earlier this week, having clearly defined parameters of treatment — set down...

...Similarly, Professor Bennoune has noted that “the persecution approach fails to adequately implicate the institutionalized and ideological nature of the abuses in question or reflect on the responsibilities of other international actors to respond appropriately.” This argument also fails to recognize the complementarity between gender apartheid and gender persecution. Indeed, the crimes of apartheid and persecution already co-exist in the Rome Statute and, more broadly, in international law. The Taliban’s institutionalized regime of systematic gender-based oppression is similar to the South African apartheid regime, where racial discrimination and the doctrine...

...The discussion additionally considers how procedural developments at international tribunals can affect domestic trials for atrocities under the ICC’s complementarity framework. The book then introduces two other dimensions of fairness. One is the use of modes of criminal responsibility that are essential to reaching individuals who do not physically perpetrate crimes, but that also can be applied too expansively. The book discusses, for example, how broad use of modes of liability, such as the ICTY’s application of joint criminal enterprise, can collide with principles of personal responsibility.  The other dimension...

...investigate individual suspects and seek indictments against them as long as they fall under the subject matter jurisdiction defined by the Rome Statute. The ICC’s process is characterized by deferential complementarity. Its primary duty is to ensure that national court systems are given sufficient opportunity to “investigate and prosecute individuals suspected of committing atrocity crimes referred to the Court” (p. 75). The ICC takes initiative only after national courts are unwilling or unable to carry out proper investigations or prosecutions. After all, “the long-term objective is to strengthen the capabilities...

...regarding the repercussions of the ad hoc declarations in particular and ratification as a whole. For example, concerns over the new declaration being in breach of Article 5 of the Minsk II agreement which provides pardon and amnesty to those involved in the conflict in the Donbass region. However, under international law such amnesty has consistently been interpreted as excluding international crimes and gross human rights violations. Therefore, if Ukrainian courts are unable or unwilling to investigate and prosecute such crimes, the ICC’s complementarity principle can be activated, as it...

...democratic rights. In this light, it is worth looking at the rise of international adjudication in the post-Cold-War world along with the increasing attention to the problem of weak and failed states. The decisions of international adjudicators in the international criminal law and human rights law areas often respond directly to political and legal institutional failures or gaps at the level of the state. The authority of international adjudicators thus may be seen as relative to that of other institutions. This is explicitly contemplated by the conception of “complementarity” that...

...deployment described in Res. 1546 and the letters from the US and Iraqi representatives accompanying that resolution (including the statement in the US letter that the MNF operate in a framework “in which the contributing states have responsibility for exercising jurisdiction over their personnel”) meet the requirement of Art. 16 and preclude ICC jurisdiction. Finally, Art. 17 of the ICC statute requires “complementarity.” That means if a local or national investigation or prosecution of the conduct at issue is taking place, the Court is prohibited from exercising its jurisdiction. The...