Search: Complementarity SAIF GADDAFI
01 Nov Mbeki Panel Member: We Wanted to Protect Bashir
...they didn’t do a very good job. As the Sudan Tribune notes, the report contains nary a critical word about the ICC or the arrest warrant. And although the report does offer Bashir a “way out” — creating a domestic accountability mechanism that would satisfy the principle of complementarity — its laundry list of needed legal reforms means that, as I have noted before, the likelihood of the Sudanese government creating such a mechanism is precisely zero. By the report’s own logic, therefore, Bashir should face prosecution by the ICC....
26 Jun The Ljubljana-The Hague Convention: Where are we Now?
...for victims in judicial assistance proceedings (Part VI). The Convention is therefore ambitious in its efforts to bolster the ICC complementarity regime and close the loopholes which have enabled perpetrators of international crimes to evade justice in the past. While the ICC Statute’s silence on the obligations of states to enact implementing legislation led to much debate in academic circles, there is no such ambiguity in the Ljubljana-The Hague Convention. In terms of cooperation, which forms the most substantial component of the Treaty and was the impetus behind it, the...
19 Apr Symposium on the ‘Legacy’ of the USA Sanctions against International Criminal Court Prosecutor Ms Fatou Bensouda and Mr Phakiso Mochochoko
...He placed the blame squarely on three individuals: Sam Shoamanesh, the chef de cabinet to the ICC Prosecutor, Phakiso Mochochoko, the head of jurisdiction, complementarity and cooperation division and the Prosecutor herself, Fatou Bensouda. The USA’s contention with the ICC also stemmed from the Prosecutor’s intention to investigate international crimes allegedly committed in the State of Palestine, which potentially implicates citizens of Israel, a long-time ally of the USA. Two months later, then-President of the USA Donald Trump issued Executive Order 13928, which sought to block the properties of certain...30 Dec Special Double Issue on the ICC
Last year, as I was reading an early draft of the agenda for the ICC’s Review Conference in 2010, I asked myself what I would change about the Rome Statute if I was King of the Assembly of States Parties. My answer was that I would amend Article 17, the complementarity provision, to make a case admissible if a national proceeding did not provide the defendant with due process — an issue I had written about before. (You can find the essay here, if you’re interested.) I then wondered what...
30 Jun Language Matters: The Role of the Presumption of Innocence in Seeking Justice During the Russia-Ukraine Conflict
...meaning of ‘public authority’. Not surprisingly those who are directly involved in the prosecution are included – judges, prosecutors, police, and investigators. However, public authorities are not limited to those who have a direct connection with the criminal case. For example, a member of the ICC Office of the Prosecutor’s Jurisdiction, Complementarity and Cooperation Division was considered a public authority. In national jurisdictions public authorities include people who are legislators and those employed by the government. In international jurisdictions the term can extend to employees of the relevant international court,...
15 Mar SCSL Symposium: A Legal Legacy that Opens the Way to Justice in Challenging Places and Times–Part I
...the atrocities are committed on the territory of ICC member states, the hybrid approach can be viewed as a form of “complementarity” that avoids taking the situation to The Hague but does not rely on exclusively national trials. It can be a better alternative than a single global court in The Hague that is expensive, distant and easy for local leaders to demonize, and national courts where it can be very hard to properly try powerful actors, particularly if these courts were dysfunctional before the violence and were further disabled...27 Jul Compensating Iraqi Victims of the US Military
...activity during war. (In the case of the UK trial, they are doing so in accordance with the complementarity provisions of the ICC statute.) By additionally compensating victims for criminal killings and for those in which no criminal charges are brought, we convey a sense of responsibility and remorse in terms that are culturally understood. But better to “refresh” training so that fewer mistakes are made in the first place. In the case of detainees, as I argued earlier this week, having clearly defined parameters of treatment — set down...
07 Apr The Growing Imperative to Recognize and Codify Gender Apartheid: Demonstrating the Need and Responding to Critics (Part II)
...Similarly, Professor Bennoune has noted that “the persecution approach fails to adequately implicate the institutionalized and ideological nature of the abuses in question or reflect on the responsibilities of other international actors to respond appropriately.” This argument also fails to recognize the complementarity between gender apartheid and gender persecution. Indeed, the crimes of apartheid and persecution already co-exist in the Rome Statute and, more broadly, in international law. The Taliban’s institutionalized regime of systematic gender-based oppression is similar to the South African apartheid regime, where racial discrimination and the doctrine...
20 May Punishing Atrocities Symposium: Fairness and Accountability in International Criminal Law
...The discussion additionally considers how procedural developments at international tribunals can affect domestic trials for atrocities under the ICC’s complementarity framework. The book then introduces two other dimensions of fairness. One is the use of modes of criminal responsibility that are essential to reaching individuals who do not physically perpetrate crimes, but that also can be applied too expansively. The book discusses, for example, how broad use of modes of liability, such as the ICTY’s application of joint criminal enterprise, can collide with principles of personal responsibility. The other dimension...
09 May Why Does the United States Continue to Oppose International Courts?
...investigate individual suspects and seek indictments against them as long as they fall under the subject matter jurisdiction defined by the Rome Statute. The ICC’s process is characterized by deferential complementarity. Its primary duty is to ensure that national court systems are given sufficient opportunity to “investigate and prosecute individuals suspected of committing atrocity crimes referred to the Court” (p. 75). The ICC takes initiative only after national courts are unwilling or unable to carry out proper investigations or prosecutions. After all, “the long-term objective is to strengthen the capabilities...