...international law would have been formally more convincing. “Special Military Operation” Notably, President Putin has euphemistically referred to Russia’s attack as a “special military operation”. This concept does not exist under international humanitarian law (IHL). The proper
terms would have been “war” or “international armed conflict” in the sense of Article 2 common to the 1949 Geneva Conventions. However, obviously, Putin could not use any of these
terms, because the aggressive
term “war” would not have been approved by his supporters, and the meaning of the technical legal phrase “international...