...negotiated the rights in question So, to sum up: because the contracting parties used a generic
term, commerce, and created a perpetual regime, the meaning of the
term ‘commerce’ is to be updated every time that the treaty is applied. It is its 2009, not its 1858, meaning that governs. But Marko’s got a fascinating critique of what he says is ICJ confusion on the difference between interpretation of a word and its construction, using the
term “cruel” in the ICCPR to illustrate the issue: Take, for example, Article 7...