Search: {search_term_string}

...also been aware that the damage to the environment would be widespread or long-term or severe or even irreversible. So why even distinguish between lawful and unlawful acts in the first place? The Damage Threshold (Severe and Either Widespread or Long-Term) The IEP adopted these terms drawing from existing provisions in Article 8(2)(b)(iv) the Rome Statute, which describes the prohibited damage under Articles 35 and 55 of Additional Protocol I to the 1949 Geneva Conventions. “Severe” is defined as “damage which involves very serious adverse changes, disruption or harm to...

...1's express reference to "as those terms are understood in international humanitarian law" other than as referring to "armed forces" as well as "armed conflict" The language references terms, plural, and the only terms appearing in the referenced preceding clause are "activities", "armed forces," and "armed conflict." Only two of those ("armed forces" and "armed conflict") are terms with a particular understanding in IHL. (Unless I'm missing something, "activities" is not a term of art in IHL). Therefore, either you write that clause out of existence entirely, you write out...

...persons was reaffirmed in the Guiding Principles on the Search for Disappeared Persons, adopted by the Committee on Enforced Disappearances (CED) in April, 2019. Principle 7 establishes that the search is a permanent obligation that “should continue until his or her fate and/or whereabouts have been determined with certainty”. In light of Art. 30 of the Convention, this principle addresses situations in which the person is found either alive or dead, and reflects the continuous nature of the search by highlighting that the search comes to an end only once...

...a regrettable reluctancy to perform search and rescue operations, mostly because of the implications on disembarkation of migrants rescued at sea. In these cases, the application of a very low jurisdictional threshold for purposes of human rights responsibility may risk being yet another disincentive. Human rights law, rather than being the enforcement mechanism of search and rescue obligations that some would like it to be, may result in even less compliance with these obligations. Conclusion A test for effective control that does not risk inhibiting search and rescue, coupled with...

...proportionality requirement, which comes from human rights law, and that is that you must employ the least harmful means of neutralizing a threat. That requirement simply does not exist when it comes to combatants in IHL. Marko Milanovic Dave, I agree entirely with the first part of your comment, and I apologize for any terminological confusion. After Additional Protocol I, the term 'combatant' means what in today's US parlance is termed a lawful combatant, i.e. someone who is entitled to participate in hostilities and who is entitled to POW status...

nature and investigations need to be undertaken until the fate of a disappeared person has been clarified. Thus, the US authorities must search for the parents until all of them have been found and the identity of all children has been established. The obligation to continue the search and establish the identity will continue also when the children are adults. Life of the Separated Children During the Search While the search for the parents continues, other obligations arise to the separated children. As victims of enforced disappearances, they are provided...

the historical context of their ongoing suffering and struggle: “Genocost” and “Nakba”. These terms highlight that “genocide” for both Congolese and Palestinians is a continuous process, not a singular event. Many organisations are pushing for campaigns against genocides in DRC and Palestine, particularly Al-Haq and the Congolese Action Youth Platform (CAYP). Due to the campaigns by Al-Haq and CAYP, the term “genocide” has gained traction among social media users globally, deployed to describe the atrocities in both Eastern DRC and Gaza Strip in Palestine. At the time of this writing,...

...the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons’ (OPCW) 7-year term of service, as well as policies of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (para. 249). It does not consider the repercussions of this term limit for staff and the broader consequences when placed in the context of international institutions and opportunities for former staff from other tribunals, specifically in The Hague. While imposing term limits may be appropriate in some instances, for example, on judicial terms of service, it is...

...Panel assessed that the Article 30 default mens rea for such consequences was too narrow and would not capture conduct with a high likelihood of resulting in severe and either widespread or long-term damage to the environment. Therefore, the Panel proposes a mens rea of recklessness or dolus eventualis, requiring awareness of a substantial likelihood of severe and either widespread or long-term damage. So “knowledge” in the definition of ecocide really means recklessness or dolus eventualis — which raises the question of why the IEP decided to use the term...

...(c) and subparagraphs (a) and (b), Article 2(c) was nevertheless intended to be equally general? The President/Presidency Council issue is more complicated. The question is whether the expression “one successive term” in Article 134 refers to the legislative “annual term” specified in Article 55 or to the “electoral term” of four years specified in Article 54. It is certainly possible that “one successive term” should have been translated as “one successive electoral term,” but I am not convinced. First, as mentioned above, the Iraqi government approved the UN’s translation. One...

...jurisprudence to life sentences the life sentence must be equated to a hypothetical fixed-term sentence, and that this hypothetical fixed-term sentence must be longer that than the longest actual fixed-term sentence imposed by an international criminal court or tribunal which is the 52 years imposed by the Special Court for Sierra Leone on Issay Sesay in 2009. In the Decision President Meron rejects Galić’s argument, finding that eligibility for early release of persons convicted by the ICTY falls exclusively within the discretion of the President and is not governed by...

you surely cannot but admit that such references cannot and do not determine legal status, but rather political opinion. Even the ICJ reference was not a legal determination but an ob iter dictum based on Palestinian documentation prsented to the court. The use by the UN secretariat and other bodies of the term OPT is nothing more than the political opinion of the majority that voted for the non-binding Gweneral Assembly resolutions concerned. They cannot be considered as legal authority. So your reliance on those sources cannot be considered serious...