Search: Complementarity SAIF GADDAFI

...power struggles or gaps that have generated state practice that tends to limit immunity, but also that suggests that there may be a complementarity requirement for universal jurisdiction. In a forthcoming article I argue that the intersection between domestic and international law in these areas generates narrow decisions that mediate the competing normative frameworks of accountability on the one hand and sovereign equality on the other. Professor Bradley’s book is a great help for newcomers to the field, but it also provides a balanced overview of the areas it surveys,...

...the case forward in the name of their national.  However, as the ILC’s 2006 commentaries Arts. 14 and 15 provide, the exhaustion of local remedies, and as such, individuals must go through national processes first, unless an exception applies (ie, domestic remedies are ineffective, inadequate, unavailable). Similar to the principle of complementarity in international criminal law, exhaustion of local remedies is meant to give deference to the place where the dispute arises, on the basis that it is often most efficient to resolve disputes where they occur, and this is...

As I was researching a new essay on complementarity, I stumbled across a fantastic article in the Chinese Journal of International Law by Paidrag McAuliffe, a Senior Lecturer at the University of Liverpool School of Law. Here is the abstract of the article, which is entitled “From Watchdog to Workhorse: Explaining the Emergence of the ICC’s Burden-sharing Policy as an Example of Creeping Cosmopolitanism”: Though it was initially presumed that the primary role of the International Criminal Court (ICC) would be a residual one of monitoring and ensuring the fulfilment...

...Several reasons were offered for this non-inclusion. Most notably, it was argued that the proposal to include corporations in the Rome Statute would detract from the focus of the Statute on individual criminal responsibility and that the absence of a recognised standard of corporate responsibility across all states would make the principle of complementarity, the cornerstone of the Rome Statute, unworkable. Twenty years later, is this still the case? The answer offered by this article is two-fold. From a descriptive point of view, it points to signs of a growing...

[Rashmi Dharia is a doctoral candidate at Sciences Po Law School, Paris.] As of 2nd April 2021, the Biden administration rescinded the sanctions that had been imposed by Executive Order 13928 of 11th June 2020 and its follow-up on 2nd September 2020 on ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda and the Head of the Jurisdiction, Complementarity and Co-operation Division Mr Phakiso Mochochoko. The US-ICC relationship looks all set to ‘go back’ from manifest and active hostility to garden variety tropes of ‘constructive engagement’ –  a story that, despite its baggage, can be...

...national capacity, particularly for our law enforcement and legal professionals, to investigate and, where appropriate, prosecute those alleged to have committed crimes under international law; and it has contributed to restoring confidence in the institutions of State and the rule of law. Capacity building is of critical importance for the principle of complementarity: at the time the Special Court was established, Sierra Leone was willing but unable to address those crimes. We were fortunate to have the support of the international community in establishing the Court to assist us to...

...III: Complementarity: Universal Aspirations Versus Tangible Results  ·         Panel IV: Justice is Interconnected and Does not End with a Sentencing: Reflecting on the Experiences of Victims, Witnesses and the Accused Before the ICC · Panel V: Whose Outreach and to Whom? · Panel VI: The ICC in the Next Five, Ten and 15 Years The leading questions at the heart of this conference are: “What have been the achievements of the ICC, especially in terms of its own goal setting and wider universal aspirations and what...

...or protest. The type of message may change over time with the evolution of the respective institution.  International criminal justice cannot simply be, but is driven by expectations of action (e.g., ‘justice must be done’). Speech act theory (e.g., John Searle) is an important analytical frame to understand practices and institutional discourses. Messaging reaches far beyond the trial as such. Communication is not only an auxiliary activity, but related to the exercise of core functions of justice institutions (Mohammad Zakerhossein). Actions, such as jurisdictional or admissibility determinations (e.g. complementarity), preliminary...

...important role in generating consensus among their clients about what relief is appropriate. Response to Naomi Roht-Arriaza Professor Roht-Arriaza offers a carefully considered and thoughtfully crafted commentary that furthers the conversation on the complementarity of collective memory and judicial proceedings. First, she reminds us that not all post-conflict settings are the same and in some localities, communities may be so disrupted that collective memories are not formed. That observation aligns with my own experience working with societies in transition after mass atrocity and I would like to underscore my agreement...

...crime fit within the complementarity regime? (There is an “understanding” appended to the adopted resolution that the aggression amendments “shall not be interpreted as creating the right or obligation to exercise domestic jurisdiction with respect to an act of aggression committed by another State.”) What effect will the amendments have on the prospects for municipal legislation and potential aggression prosecutions down the line? And there are, of course, many other details over which we could quibble. The flood of new scholarship on this issue will soon be upon us. But...

...and civil proceedings seems unjustified, since (as the Chamber acknowledges at para. 207) “[t]here is no doubt that individuals may in certain circumstances also be personally liable for wrongful acts which engage the State’s responsibility.” Unless a Grand Chamber revisits the Jones opinion, it appears likely that, conceptually incoherent as it might be, the law of foreign official immunity will develop for the time being along two tracks: the non-recognition of immunity ratione materiae for international crimes that is a logical corollary of the Rome Statute’s complementarity regime and that...

...the OTP to investigate in the West Bank, the direct or indirect transfer of the civilian population into occupied territory, thereby ensuring that Israel could not take advantage of the Rome Statute’s principle of complementarity. It’s a creative suggestion — and one that I’ve been hearing with increasing regularity from people sympathetic to the Palestinian cause. (I’ve just returned from a wonderful conference in Tel Aviv, a trip that included giving three different presentations in one day — a new record for me.) But would such a geographically-limited self-referral be...