In my forthcoming book on US-UN relations (appearing this summer from Hoover Press),
Living with the UN, I describe three different “modes” of the Security Council. By this I mean ways in which the Security Council might function, for some given situation, in regards to international peace and security. (An early version of this is found in
this paper on the Security Council in a multipolar world at SSRN, and I will post a non-final-edited version of the chapter from the book to SSRN as well.) The three modes are:
- The Security Council as the “management committee of our fledgling collective security system.” The phrase “management committee” comes from Kofi Annan, who used it repeatedly in his final months as Secretary General. It refers to the Security Council as acting as a genuine “corporate” whole to make global determinations and take action regarding international security.
- The Security Council as the “concert of the nations,” acting as the conduit great powers, or at least a sizable number of them, in concert toward some end that has at least some blessing or acquiescence or non-veto by the members of the Security Council. The difference from the management committee is that the Council acts functionally not as a “corporate” body but instead a group of great powers, an agglomeration and not an entity.
- The Security Council as the “talking shop of the nations.” In this mode, the Security Council is just that — a negotiating space for the great powers, in which one hopes they reach a modus vivendi with respect to themselves and others.