Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo

In association with the International Commission of Jurists

  • Topics ↓
    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓
    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓
    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓
    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast
  • Topics ↓

    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓

    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓

    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓

    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast

Author: Tajra Smajic

03 Sep

When the Regulator Becomes the Respondent: The NORI and TOML Orders and the Reviewability Gap in Article 189 UNCLOS

[Tajra Smajic is a PhD candidate at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, specializing in the governance of deep seabed mining.] On 18 July 2026, the Seabed Disputes Chamber (SDC) issued orders on requests for provisional measures in two parallel proceedings brought by Nauru Ocean Resources (NORI) (Case 34) and Tonga Offshore Mining Ltd (TOML) (Case 35). These are the first...

Tajra Smajic | 0 Comments
Recent Posts
  • Symposium on the CCW GGE LAWS: Obstacles Avoided? Rolling Towards Consensus for the 2026 GGE LAWS Report
  • National Security Abroad, Constitutional Rights at Home: United States Sanctions Against the ICC and the Ensuing Legal Challenges
  • The Interpretation of ‘Abeyance’ in Pakistan v. India: An Inconclusive Finding Unsound in Doctrine and Policy
  • Return on Whose Terms? What The Gambia v. Myanmar Should Say About Going Home
  • Symposium on the CCW GGE LAWS: You Can’t Always Get What You Want–The (D)evolution of Responsibility and Accountability

© Opinio Juris | Design by Open & Honest | In association with the International Commission of Jurists