Can You Be Pro-Free Trade and Anti-Investor State Dispute Settlement?

by Julian Ku

Simon Lester of Worldtradelaw.net and the Cato Institute offered a very interesting pro-free trade argument against the inclusion of investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) in trade agreements like the TransPacific Partnership or the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership.  I disagree and we discussed and debated the issue today in a lively conversation hosted by Columbia University’s Center for Sustainable Investment.

http://opiniojuris.org/2015/11/05/can-you-be-pro-free-trade-and-anti-investor-state-dispute-settlement/

One Response

  1. Great debate; here is a short focus on one of the fundamental challenges with ISDS between countries with well-developed legal systems (in the Columbia Center for Sustainable Development series “New Thinking on Investment Treaties): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Drv0NmytvRU

Trackbacks and Pingbacks

  1. There are no trackbacks or pingbacks associated with this post at this time.