The ILC takes up Jus Cogens

by Kristen Boon

On May 27, 2015 Mr. Dire Tladi of South Africa was appointed Special Rapporteur for a new topic on the International Law Commission’s agenda:  jus cogens.  The progressive development and codification of jus cogens principles marks a significant step forward.  For many years it was considered, as Ian Brownlie once quipped, “like the car that never left the garage.”  The ILC’s syllabus, available here, suggests a bright new future lies ahead.

The scope of the Commission’s inquiry is likely to focus on the following elements:  the nature of jus cogens; requirements for the identification of a norm as jus cogens; an illustrative list of norms which have achieved the status of jus cogens; consequences or effects of jus cogens.

If you are interested in updates on the ILC’s work such as this one, I encourage you to sign up for Arnold Pronto’s new twitter feed. Arnold is a Senior Legal Officer in the Codification Division in the Office of Legal Affairs, and is the new UN Representative for an ILA group that will be preparing a report on international law activities at the UN twice a year.   Arnold will be tweeting out international law related events as they happen here at the UN. If you’re interested, he is at @arnoldpronto 

http://opiniojuris.org/2015/05/28/the-ilc-takes-up-jus-cogens/

2 Responses

  1. I’m really glad to see that the ILC is taking up this subject. It’s insufficiently developed and understood.

  2. In my view, the area is underdeveloped because of the natural law origins of the concept and the unwillingness of international courts to go beyond the traditional positivist thesis. The ILC’s comments in the Annex here: http://legal.un.org/ilc/reports/2014/english/annex.pdf, at para. 14 are enough to show that the ILC is engaging in a certain degree of revisionism if it considers jus cogens to have its basis in the consent of states.

    By sustaining this myth they will in fact ‘cool down’ the normative aspects of the doctrine. The issue should continue to be developed organically by international courts and tribunals instead.

Trackbacks and Pingbacks

  1. There are no trackbacks or pingbacks associated with this post at this time.