Iran Nuke Review Act Does Not Actually “Require” a Vote of Congress
According to the WSJ, the “Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act” that I discussed earlier this week may already have 64 declared supporters in the Senate. This means that supporters are only 3 votes shy of enough to override President Obama’s veto of this bill.
Since the bill might actually become law, it is worth reminding supporters of the bill that it does NOT guarantee that Congress will vote on the Iran nuke deal. This might be confusing, but as I argued earlier this week, the proposed law would only suspend the lifting of sanctions for 60 days. During that 60-day period, Congress could vote on the bill, or it could choose not to do so. Silence would allow the sanctions to be lifted after the 60 days. So it is not quite right to say, as the WSJ does, that the proposed law would “require a vote of Congress.” Still, it is quite likely that Congress would vote, and at least this bill would give them the opportunity to do so.
If the bill passes, and a veto fight breaks out, it will be worth considering whether President Obama invokes any constitutional arguments to justify his position. I believe that President Obama’s threatened veto reflects a robust and unilateralist conception of the President’s power to make sole executive agreements without Congressional approval. It will be interesting to see if he defends his veto on constitutional grounds.