Do Cyberattacks Fall Under the War Powers Act?
Just a quick note on the news reports about the internal Obama Administration legal debate over the use of cyberattacks in the Libya conflict. These reports seem to confirm Stewart Baker’s complaint that cyberwar capabilities are being shaped by legal concerns as much as, if not more than, policy goals. Two small observations:
1) Following David Fidler’s point here, how is the legality of cyberwar attacks a difficult issue in Libya, given that the Administration concluded that drone attacks are not “hostilities” within the meaning of the War Powers Act? I find it far more likely that the debate internally was not over law, but policy. Is it wise to unveil US cyber attack capabilities in Libya? Would they even work? At least, I hope this is what the real debate was about.
2) More broadly, what is the deal with all this leaking of legal policy debates? I am curious who is doing the leaking, and whether this is part of a broader strategy of rolling out the Administration’s legal views on difficult issues via leaks? Can we just have the full memos please?