One Consequence of CIA Drone Strikes

One Consequence of CIA Drone Strikes

Like Ken, I plan on discussing Phillip Alston’s report on drone strikes when it’s released.  Alston was just at Melbourne Law School last week, talking about his role as rapporteur.  He’s a remarkable person.

With regard to drone strikes in armed conflict, Ken quite rightly points out that CIA operators cannot lawfully be attacked by a terrorist group even if they themselves do not qualify as privileged belligerent — an unprivileged belligerent such as a terrorist has no privilege to attack anyone.  But he overlooks one important point: because a privileged belligerent could lawfully attack a CIA operator, a terrorist who attacked and killed a CIA operator would not be committing a war crime.  His crime would be murder.

That’s important, of course, because of what I noted yesterday: if our hypothetical terrorist is guilty of murder but not of a war crime, he could not lawfully be prosecuted in a military commission, regardless of what the Department of Defense says.  He would have to be prosecuted in a domestic court.

And that, of course, would be the end of Western Civilization itself.

Topics
Foreign Relations Law, International Criminal Law, International Human Rights Law
No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.