As I mentioned last week, we’re pleased to host Richard Gardiner (University College London) for the next three days for a discussion of his book, Treaty Interpretation.  In addition to comments by our regular contributors, we’ve invited several distinguished treaty experts to respond to his work, including Isabelle van Damme (Clare College, Cambridge), Malgosia Fitzmaurice (University of London, Queen Mary), and Jan Klabbers (Helsinki).  Some of our guest experts will be commenting on the book itself, others may choose to comment on the comments.  In either case, we’re looking forward to the discussion, and will, of course, welcome comments and questions from readers as well.

Related Posts

• March 6, 2009 -- Thanks for the Treaty Interpretation Series
• March 4, 2009 -- The Abiding Relevance of Treaty Interpretation
• March 4, 2009 -- Beyond the Vienna Rules
• March 4, 2009 -- The VCLT and the New Haven School
• March 3, 2009 -- Art and Rules
• March 3, 2009 -- The Invisible College
• March 3, 2009 -- The Function of Principles of Treaty Interpretation
• March 3, 2009 -- Art and Auto-Interpretation of Treaties
• March 2, 2009 -- Textuality and Preparatory Work
• March 2, 2009 -- Interpretation as the Continuation of Politics by Other Means
• March 2, 2009 -- Treaty Interpretation and Preparatory Work
• March 2, 2009 -- Article 31 of the VCLT and ‘textualism’
• March 2, 2009 -- New Haven School, Textuality and Dynamic Interpretation
• March 2, 2009 -- Treaty Interpretation: Reviewing the Rules