30 Oct OJ Ranked 19th in Visitors Among Law Professor Blogs
TaxProfBlog has posted a chart with the visitor and page view ranks for law professor blogs for the last quarter. Our Very Own Opinio Juris is ranked number 19th in visitors. Of course, we like to think that it is the quality, rather than the quantity, of our visitors that matters. And we do thank you for coming by.
However, I can’t resist commenting that with the rise of empirical studies among legal scholars, and among international legal studies, we have developed a passion – mania, even? – for counting things.
It is not historically unprecedented; in the rise of literacy and educated thought in 18th century Britain, a certain mania for counting all sorts of things developed – somewhat in a vacuum, as the tools of statistical analysis had not yet been developed. This was the period, for example, when amateurs began counting, among other things, deaths and death rates in London and then beyond, and the result was eventually the profession of actuary.
But what I cannot help noticing is that when we law professors count things, the things we apparently most love to count are matters of importance to being a law professor. Ever more refined ways of measuring scholarly productivity, for example – isn’t the fastest way to the top of the SSRN rankings (besides an article entitled F***) an article talking about UN News rankings, measuring scholarly citations, etc., etc.? I admit to being as fascinated by it as the next person – er, law professor – even though in many cases I can’t think for the life of me what difference it ought to make.
Ken-
You are spot on with your observation about law profs loving to count things mostly of importance — or even interest to — law professors. The quantitative reviews that some faculties do of faculty candidates (numbers of SSRN downloads, citations counts from other law reviews, etc.) have similarly devolved into bean-counting exercises devoid of real qualitative analysis.
But I am really looking forward to the “UN News Rankings”; U.S. News will surely feel the heat of that competition. (That could not have been an intentional typo, could it?)
This is the fourteenth complaint I’ve read during the last six months about a predilection for counting.
Ken,
Well, isn’t it that our profession is, as Koskenniemi would put it, an argumentative practice designed to persuade people. While one can imagine a (mad) scientist sitting all alone in his lab and doing the science just for its own sake, a lawyer does what he does only in relation to others. Counting one’s SSRN downloads, citations, or whatever, is just a somewhat tangible way for measuring influence. And we all want to be influential, don’t we?
Then of course there’s that whole “my SSRN count is bigger then yours” thing…
Wow. The way my subterranean mind thinks! I think I will leave the typo as is …