Beth Van Schaack has a really nice primer on Boumediene available here. She will join us at Opinio Juris for more detailed discussion and analysis of the opinion shortly.

Related Posts

• June 17, 2008 -- Closing Remarks on Boumediene Insta-Symposium
• June 17, 2008 -- Deference Reconsidered
• June 17, 2008 -- More on Eisenstrager
• June 16, 2008 -- Commentary to Boumediene
• June 16, 2008 -- Function Over Form
• June 16, 2008 -- Symbolism Over Substance?
• June 15, 2008 -- What is De Facto Sovereignty?
• June 15, 2008 -- What Now?
• June 13, 2008 -- Does Ignoring Precedent Matter?
• June 13, 2008 -- What Comes Next?
• June 13, 2008 -- Boumediene: History vs. Analogy
• June 13, 2008 -- What’s Left of Judicial Deference?
• June 13, 2008 -- The Importance of Boumediene
• June 13, 2008 -- Boumediene and Choice of Law
• June 13, 2008 -- Three Reflections on Boumediene
• June 13, 2008 -- Boumediene and the Use of History; Boumediene & Munaf
• June 12, 2008 -- A Second Take on Boumediene: Habeas Corpus and Military Commissions
• June 12, 2008 -- Good Day in Gitmo, Bad Day in Iraq
• June 12, 2008 -- What Difference Does Citizenship Make? Even Less, After Boumediene
• June 12, 2008 -- A First Take On Boumediene: Habeas Corpus and Error Correction
• June 12, 2008 -- The Territorial Reach of the Constitution
• June 12, 2008 -- Roberts Summarizes Boumediene: No One Wins
• June 12, 2008 -- Boumediene “Insta-Symposium”