RSS
Print This PageWhat Do Philippe Sands and John Yoo Have in Common?
Pretty tough question, eh? The answer: both of their recent books on the US and international law post-9/11 have been remaindered — that is, they have been deeply discounted from their list prices (see here and here).
What does this say about the reading public? No ideological explanations available, since they come at it from opposite perspectives. Editorial thoughts aside (and the possibility in Philippe’s case of competing paperback and updated editions, although both of them look pretty cheap, too), could it be that Americans — even high-brow consumers of “serious non-fiction”, in the terms of the trade — still don’t care that much about international law?
Related Posts
6 Responses
Trackbacks and Pingbacks
- There are no trackbacks or pingbacks associated with this post at this time.
As you say, a tough question – Sands being a respected international law practitioner and academic and Yoo an ideological hack complicit in international crimes – isn’t part of the point that Yoo’s polemic has been out for about six months and Sands’ book, in successive editions, for more than two years?
at 9:52 pm EST Max
Is Sands really respected as a scholar as opposed to a pundit? I tend to put him in the Ramsey Clark category on his worst day … I can’t really think of a theory or big idea based on Sands work. I can be convinced otherwise, but don’t really see much difference between Sands and Yoo minus ideology.
at 10:14 pm EST The NewStream Dream
The NewStream Dream,
Please spare us such nonsense: Sands is indeed a respected scholar, as the following from his University of London faculty website clearly attests:
He is Professor of Law and Director of the Centre on International Courts and Tribunals in the Faculty, and a key member of staff in the Centre for Law and the Environment. His teaching areas include public international law, the settlement of international disputes, and environmental and natural resources law.
Philippe has previously held academic positions at the University of London’s School of Oriental and African Studies, Kings College London, University of Cambridge and New York University. He was co-founder of FIELD (Foundation for International Environmental Law and Development), and established the programmes on Climate Change and Sustainable Development. He is a member of the Advisory Boards of the European Journal of International Law and Review of European Community and International Environmental Law (Blackwell Press).
As a practicing barrister he has extensive experience litigating cases before the International Court of Justice, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, the International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, and the European Court of Justice. He frequently advises governments, international organisations, NGOs and the private sector on aspects of international law. In 2003 he was appointed a Queen’s Counsel.
Research
Professor Sands is Co-Project Director of the Project on International Courts and Tribunals (www.pict-pcti.org). The project has the following aims and objectives:
- to facilitate access to and transparency in the work of international courts and tribunals;
- to enhance the effectiveness of international courts and tribunals;
- to promote greater knowledge about international courts and tribunals; and
- to promote international peace through international justice and rule of law.
The project is doing research into policy, legal and operational, issues in the administration of international justice in the twenty-first century, such as the composition and independence of the international bench.
Professor Sands is Co-Director of a project on Risk Assessment and Biotechnology with New York University’s School of Law.
Publications
Lawless World: America and the Making and Breaking of Global Rules (Penguin, 2005).
Documents in International Environmental Law, Cambridge University Press, 2004 (edited with Paolo Galizzi)
From Nuremberg to The Hague: The Future of International Criminal Justice, Cambridge University Press, 2003 (editor)
Principles of International Environmental Law, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 2003
Justice for Crimes Against Humanity, Hart Publishing, 2003 (edited with Mark Lattimer)
Bowett’s Law of International Institutions, Sweet &Maxwell, 5th edition, 2001 (co-author with Pierre Klein, Universite Libre de Bruxelles)
Environmental Law, The Economy and Sustainable Development (co-edited with Richard Stewart and Richard Revesz) Cambridge University Press, 2000
The Manual of International Courts and Tribunals (with Shany and Mackenzie), Butterworths, 1999
The International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons (collection of essays edited with Laurence Boisson de Chazournes, Cambridge University Press, 1999)
Principles of International Environmental Law, Manchester University Press, 1995 (Vols. I, II and III); 2nd edition to be published by Cambridge University Press in 2003.
Greening International Law (editor), Earthscan, 1993
Chernobyl: Law and Communication, 340 pp. (Grotius Publications/Cambridge University Press) 1988.
Plus articles on international, environmental and natural resources law.
I think I understand now why you use a pseudonym. Let’s hope no one judges you in the unseemly manner you’ve chosen to characterize Professor Sands.
at 10:35 pm EST Patrick S. O'Donnell
Why on earth would anyone want to buy a book by Yoo? His memos were enough to make me scream (though the pain did not approach that of organ failure or death, so what do I have to complain about?). It would appear that the audience for (what is the term, statists, monarchists, tsarists?) is pleasantly limited. His natural audience may be only those at the top of an executive branch (and even they probably aren’t reading his book), the rest of us have to live under it. Sir Thomas More in A Man for All Seasons: ‘And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you – where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?’
And by the way Mr. O’Donnell, pseudonyms are healthy and historical (though of course they have been used sometimes for ugly causes as well as good). But I must agree with Mr. O’Donnell that lumping anyone in with Ramsey Clark is an ‘unseemly’ characterization.
at 4:07 pm EST Diplomatic Gunboat
On the whole, I do not think pseudonyms have been healthy in the blogosphere, although I can certainly understand why, on occasion, one might need to resort to same.
at 4:58 pm EST Patrick S. O'Donnell
Sorry, I wrote my comment in a hurry and was not as clear as I should have been. I meant to say that I don’t think Sands latest stuff is scholarly, its meant more for the not highly trained crowd. Rather than Ramsey Clark, I think a better comparator is Krugman. Krugman started off doing highly theoritical work, then moved to being a pundit who mainly comments on the Bush administration. Being a pundit is not necessairly bad, but I don’t think Max’s original comparison slamming Yoo is fair.
Say what you want about Yoo and his work with the administration, but his book is an important work. You can disagree with him, but his theory on the division of power in the U.S. as a function of the internal and the external is powerful. I just wish people had the intellectual maturity to appreciate the work, while being able to disagree with it. Frankly, we have lost that in this field.
at 12:45 am EST The NewStream Dream