Global “Leaders” Reach Climate Change Deal

Global “Leaders” Reach Climate Change Deal

As the BBC reports, “a meeting in Washington of global political leaders has reached a new agreement on tackling climate change.” The meeting included representatives from the key non-Kyoto Treaty countries, the U.S. and China. So have we finally reached a breakthrough on global climate change policy?



Nope. At least not yet. The meeting in Washington D.C. was held between legislators from the leading economies of the world. Hence, from the U.S., legislators like Senator John McCain and Senator John Kerry attended. Facilitated by GLOBE (“Global Legislators Organisation for a Balanced Environment), the meeting cannot and did not generate a legally binding international agreement. (And given that non-Kyoto countries like the U.S. have, on average, been reducing greenhouse gas emissions faster than Kyoto countries, this may even be a good thing (see here for the WSJ($) editorial on this point)).



Still, the GLOBE resolutions could be important. Plainly, this type of gathering is part of the informal alliance of intergovernmental networks popularized by Dean Anne-Marie Slaughter in her work. In this case, legislators are working together to try to shift global policy, even if they cannot formally act together via international agreement. Whether this type of legislator-network is a salutary trend remains difficult to say, but it is certainly something to keep an eye on.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Topics
General
Notify of
Peter Spiro
Peter Spiro

Julian, Very interesting. Along similar lines, check out this op-ed a few days back in the WaPo by Jim Hoagland on the “diplomats of Capitol Hill.”

Annabel
Annabel

I wonder whether potential problems with such legislator-driven initiatives are located in the international sphere or rather in the domestic sphere of a particular state. From an international law point of view, I don’t see the big issue with such initiatives – they may even add a flavor of democracy to international law making, that is of course if the legislators manage to persuade their executives to adopt a certain policy. The problem of “535 would be secretaries of state” that Jim Hoagland quotes in his op-ed is in my opinion more related to US politics than to international law.