24 Mar The Long Road to Democracy
Daniel Drezner has a post (and there are some equally interesting comments) on the ousting of the President of Kyrgyzstan. He asks whether the news from Kyrgyzstan and the recent events in Lebanon, Egypt, Iraq, and Afghanistan are the first hints of a new “wave” of democratization, in the sense popularized by Samuel Huntington’s book The Third Wave.
I hope that we are witnessing a Fourth (or Fifth?) wave of democratization. However, I have concerns as to whether this is in fact a long term shift to democracy that we are witnessing. And I have even greater concerns that democracy doesn’t come in waves but rather is arrived at after walking a long and idiosyncratic path in each country.
As for whether there is a general shift to democracy taking place, I think we need to temper our optimism with a little caution. For one thing, some of the “reforms” seem more like window-dressing than anything substantive. Egypt’s reforms might be in this category.
Moreover, democratization often leads to instability in the short-run; whether instability or stable democracy defines the long term is an open question. Iraq and Afghanistan are the obvious examples of the concern over long-term stability. With the recent increase in bombings and counter-demonstrations, Lebanon may slip into this category as well.
And, on top of this, the U.S. can still “lose the peace” if it is not vigilant. The short-changing of democratization and stabilization initiatives in Afghanistan is an example of exactly the type of foreign policy we do not want. Nurturing democracies in post-conflict situations is a long, delicate, and expensive process. In Afghanistan, we lost our concentration as we moved on to Iraq. Rather than a beacon of what democracy can do to free a people, it is in the process of becoming a cautionary tale of how hard-won gains can be quickly lost. Iraq is a work in progress, of course, but some of the current indicators are not very good, as discussed in this recent report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Then there is Pakistan…
And, while we are getting enthused about the Fourth Wave of democratization, let us not forget about the Third Wave. We like to remember the vindication of the generation of ’56 in Hungary and the Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia and the triumph of Solidarity in Poland, but let’s also talk about democracy in Russia, Romania, Bulgaria, Serbia, Bosnia, Croatia, and Albania. Where democracy has taken root in these countries it was not from some unstoppable process but because of a hard fought political battles and, in certain cases, international military intervention and significant financial and technical support. Overall, in all of these countries, whether or not democracy took hold had less to do with a wave and more to do with history, political culture, and, at times, international interest and support.
I hope we are seeing an inexorable spread of democracy. That would be nice. But I wouldn’t bank on it, it is much too early to tell, anyway. However, if we really want to make the world safe for democracy, as opposed to making the world safe for foreign investment, then we better decide to gear-up for the long road ahead and find the travelling companions that we will need to see this through.
Chris, let me address your concerns whether the current wave of democratization is in fact a long term shift. Of course it is. Trace our own country’s expansion. The early part of the 19th century spread citizens and ideals from ocean to ocean. This influence also accounted for a population growth from around 5 million in 1801 to more than 22 million in 1850. Democratization is frought with conflict, even war wherever it threatens to oust established authority. Our country waged merciless extinction of American Indian tribes who were too primitive to counter any substantial setbacks to our expansion. Mexico suffered irreperable harm winning its independence from Spain, otherwise Texas might not have made the top 50 list. During which, we exploited Africans as slaves and were isolated and protected by vast oceans. We had it pretty easy compared to Albania or Afghanistan or Lebanon in terms of hard fought battles establishing freedom at home. And today, there has been substantial progress in these and other countries when compared to 50 years ago. If some of the “reforms” as you say, appear “more like window-dressing than anything substantive,” Perhaps your impressions are impatient or perhaps you’ve spotted areas where democracy… Read more »
Chris,
I’d like to see some specific backing for your sweeping statement that “[i]n Afghanistan, we lost our concentration as we moved on to Iraq. Rather than a beacon of what democracy can do to free a people, it is in the process of becoming a cautionary tale of how hard-won gains can be quickly lost.” Granted drug trafficking has increased, but I dare say it’s hardly a “cautionary tale of how hard-won gains can be quickly lost.” See Secretary Condoleezza Rice, Remarks with Afghan President Hamid Karzai, Mar. 17, 2005, available at http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2005/43556.htm (reviewing situation in Afghanistan).
“Elections have become a common feature of the political landscape of the Middle East and North Africa, where dozens of elections for office have taken place in recent years. But more, and frequent election, or even some political liberalization is not synonymous with democratization.” (Is the Middles East Democratizing? Ehteshami, Anoushiravan. British Journal of Middle East Studies (1999) 26(2),(p.199-217) p. 199 In the Middle East and North African (MENA), elections have rarely been used promote and develop participatory system, rather elections have been primarily used to strengthen the power of the ruling elite. Though 80 elections took place with high voter turnout, during the 1990s, in the MENA region, little political change occurred. Some barriers to democratization in MENA have been: the ruling elite’s manipulation of electoral procedures; the use of economic growth as an excuse to maintain strict authoritarianism; the suppression of opposition. In many MENA states the ruling elite have arranged the electoral process in such a way that citizen participation has virtually no impact. Some constitutions and complex procedures have been designed to deter the rise of political groups, holding minority position. Some examples: 1) In Kuwait, the constitution was amended in 1996 to allow the president… Read more »