Search: unwilling or unable

...I must confess that I have written a draft article on the application of municipal criminal law in extraterritorial armed conflict but have been unable to invest the necessary time to refine and format it. Part of the reason for that is that I have also begun a different article that considers evidence and arguments for placing military commissions in a different theoretical perspective. I may try to post a summary of my key points of analysis on the former subject in the not-too-distant future. The latter article may ultimately...

...of these intelligence types will face any sanction for their acts, simply because the Justice Department is simply unwilling to bring those cases. Moreover, the departments are so willing to do things like give people use immunity, try to get pardons in advance, and those with the power so willing to give these things that the whole arena of oversight is one thing - a joke. It is smoke and mirrors to the American public about any sense of rule of law in this space. So all the hand wringing...

...process in good faith rather than what it appeared to be as a process to allow torture, then I could see going down that path. But, my understanding of the universal or almost universal rejection of those US efforts was that, around the world, states were unwilling to enter into such a discussion when they sensed that the underlying purpose was to legitimize the US torture. They might play games through intelligence services to show they were "helpful" to the US due to US pressure, but they were not going...

...a domestic crime (unless part of a genocide or crime against humanity -- and not every extrajudicial killing is necessarily one or the other). If an agent's domestic law provides authority to engage in the act (like spying), then the violation of another state's law only truly matters if the agent is caught and unable or unwilling to claim official immunity for the act. So far as I am aware, state intelligence agencies are frequently authorized by their state's domestic laws to engage in violations of other states' domestic laws....

...those academics and others who were absolutely unwilling to consider the evidence of civilian casualties as credible; for example, I was on an Al Jazeera show a few days back where Christine Fair was absolutely refusing to accept that there have been *any* civilian casualties of drone strikes because her 'sources' told her so. She rubbished the reports of the BIJ, New America Foundation and anyone else as using flawed methodology to count civilian casualties but was saying the USG methodology is sound - we all know how sound that...

...be noted that Texas declared independence not from a European monarch but from Mexico in 1836. Matthew Gross Please explain. Would you also say that the United States has no business urging Europeans to stop doing business with terrorist countries? And what about China? Must the United States make no diplomatic attempts to stop China from engaging in practices we perceive to be major human rights or intellectual property violations? Those are false analogies. The EU essentially brow-beat an unwilling populace, and then countries that wanted admittance, into approving an...

...the jurisprudence of the ICTY/R to a significant extent. However, this requires a careful, methodical approach, e.g., to link the ICTY/R jurisprudence to article 21 or to the object and purpose of the Rome Statute. Too often, commentators assume the ICC is unwilling to follow the ICTY/R or is looking to chart a new course when the ICC is simply in need of a road map to connect that jurisprudence to the Rome Statute. In this regard, Leila’s article and the work of Darryl and Elies will help the judges...

...have never understood the unwillingness of US administrations to enter such litigation (save relatively rarely), if only to assert that the government’s views can never be ignored. But it seems to me politically the worst idea of all to fail to enter all but a few of such cases across many many years – and then suddenly assert that the US government’s views suddenly are hugely important only when China, and its officials or former officials, are being sued in US court. It would be a horrible signal to send...

...names, along with the explanation that they are unwilling to face the public ostracism that the Israeli society reserves for the "traitors" whistleblowers who dare speak to Breaking the Silence -- or for those who are satisfied with the pre-1967 lines as borders. And a final point that helps corroborate the callousness that is present in the IDF, partly as a result of the unwillingness of the IDF to investigate and punish any violators. I quote Amos Harel again, on how some soldiers shoot Palestinians just in order to get...

...terrorist, legal or not) is simply radicalizing Muslims further and swelling the ranks of groups like Al Qaeda. So, in fact, it is people like you -- people who are defiantly unwilling to consider the causes of terrorism -- that are undermining US security. JohnnieWalkerBlue Kevin and Guy, I disagree. Why? Because we are not dealing with formal states in traditional battle - plane against plane, tank against tank. We are not dealing with warfare on an open battle field. You have to realize that the "enemy" is using suicide...

...society for the Executive and Legislative to confront some type of check. Why? Because for seven years the Executive and Legislative have demonstrated that they are unwilling to act in a manner consistent with the good faith that is the predicate for the kind of judicial deference those in the minority would prefer. Best, Ben Benjamin Davis Souter's concurrence points out the essence of what is going on here After six years of sustained executive detentions in Guantanamo, subject to habeas jurisdiction but without any actual habeas scrutiny, today’s decision...

Jordan Jennifer: the R2P argument is mostly a humanitarian intervention argument, which Deborah (post below) and others do not accept. States were unable to agree on unilateral use of force in response to a state's violation of R2P (at the time of the 2005 G.A. Res.). A textually sound and policy-serving claim would be that Article 2(4) facially only prohibits three types of armed force and that in the special circumstance of an ongoing belligerency in Syria and substantial outside recognition of the opposition as the legitimate representative of the...