Search: unwilling or unable

...that the United States, the traditional leader and bankroller of the alliance, is exhausted by a decade of war and and its own mounting budget deficits, and simply may not see NATO as worth supporting any longer. “The blunt reality is that there will be dwindling appetite and patience in the U.S. Congress – and in the American body politic writ large – to expend increasingly precious funds on behalf of nations that are apparently unwilling to devote the necessary resources or make the necessary changes to be serious and...

...ESRs is not compatible with material inequality. There are limits to the degree of economic inequality that can be reconciled with the notions of equality and dignity that the human rights movements promises. Even if human rights may be rightly said to have become prisoners of the contemporary age of inequality, this imprisonment is not “for life” because ESRs do have the tools and the desire to fight economic inequality. Maybe the problem with ESRs is not that they are incapable and unwilling to confront the spectre of  global inequality,...

...the future. Moreover, France does not recognise the right to self-defense against non-State actors if the act is not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a State. It specifically rejects the view held by a majority of the Tallinn Manual 2.0 experts whereby State practice has established such a right in circumstances where use of force against non-State actors “complies with the principle of necessity (…), is the only effective means of defence against the armed attack, and the territorial State is unable (…) or unwilling to take effective actions” to...

...underlying purposes of international immunities.”’ (First Instance decision, p. 8). The language of a ‘corresponding benefit’ has been presumably developed by the courts to address the problematic drafting of the express immunity waivers included in the constituent instruments of several international financial institutions. In Mendaro, it was said that ‘most organizations would be unwilling to relinquish their immunity without receiving a corresponding benefit which would further the organization’s goals’. Immunity in that case was only restricted for ‘actions arising out of [an organisation’s] external commercial contracts and activities’. The rationale...

...also more than tripled, from three per day in 2005 to more than 10 per day in 2006. With NATO unable or unwilling to stem the rising violence, the Taliban are pressing their advantage. Rather than withdrawing to regroup over the winter, intelligence officials and combat commanders said, the Taliban forces — clad in new cold-weather boots and fleece jackets — are fighting through the bitter cold months. “It is bleak,” said Colonel Chris Haas, commander of the Joint Special Operations Task Force in Afghanistan. Conway said US commanders understand...

The FDA has approved the import of one Spanish firm’s version of Jamon Iberico Bellota, a cured ham which according to this blog makes prosciutto “taste like shoe leather.” (Don’t expect to see it at your local supermarket, though; at $79 a pound, it’s a little on the pricey side.) (Hat tip: Megnut.) Why is the U.S. Government so unwilling to undertake an exercise in mutual regulatory trust where it would seem most obviously to apply? (The ham approval is more an matter of applying FDA standards extraterritorially — presumably...

...is that large-scale and heinous crimes are committed against populations deprived of protection against these acts. This would mean that these crimes are either committed by States or State-like entities, or contexts in which the State is unable or unwilling to protect the victim population. Adejoké Babington-Ashaye takes issue with this finding, arguing that the societal context in which a crime is committed should not be a determining factor. And I agree with this legally speaking (as I do with most of her post!): I do not intend – and...

...on his way and board his flight to Montreal? Canada was evidently unwilling to receive him.” Had Judge Jacobs, who wrote for the majority, bothered himself a bit with the record, he would have discovered that Canada confirmed it was willing to accept him home. Moreover, this is hardly a trivial error. The gravity of the government misconduct in this case comes from the decision to send Arar to Syria when he could have been returned to Canada, sent to Switzerland, or back to Tunisia, where he had been vacationing....

...but efforts are underway. India has negotiated treaties with Belarus and Chinese Taipei and has also signed Joint Interpretative Statements with countries such as Bangladesh. Although India is not party to the RCEP, the decision to suspend ISDS in the final text for a certain period can be attributed to, among others, India’s position during the negotiating rounds. For instance, Article 10.18 of RCEP provides a strong indication that the Parties were unable to reach agreement about ISDS. It provides, instead, that the parties would discuss this topic within two...

...situations the defendant may have selected the worse outcome because they are unwilling to sacrifice the life of the threatened individual. American jurisdictions impose restrictions on the application of both defenses. Under the rule from Dudley & Stephens, necessity and duress are unavailable in cases of murder. There is a complicated question of whether the same exclusion should apply in manslaughter cases. It seems clear to me that the Foleys, if they had paid a ransom to ISIS, would be (and should be) entitled to a duress defense. If they...

...program if it wanted? The capacity for executive enforcement is quite formidable once decisions are taken. In this regard, the democratic U.S. may have a more difficult time implementing costly policies. We have a formally federal structure that complicates policy implementation. We have a culture of “adversarial legalism” in which no major decision ever goes unchallenged in the courts. And we seem to be quite unwilling to take any positions that require political will. Bottom line: the U.S. may be just as much an obstacle as China in this area....

...U.S. policy, and that ideals are important both in their own right, but also because they serve U.S. interests. If we had obtained some incredibly valuable intelligence from Guantanamo, something that really justified this coercive interrogation regime, then I think these men might sing a different tune. But we haven’t. And these men are unwilling to bless a policy which has done so much to harm America’s moral standing in the world, in the absence of any tangible or visible benefit. I think the pig-headedness of the Administration on torture...