authority. There he rehearses his discussion, to have more play in his new
book, of “bathos,” that law’s technocratic, procedural process can never encompass the horrors of great evil. In this earlier
book, Simpson identified a tension within war crimes law: “I argue that war crimes law negotiates between a liberal cosmopolitanism (emphasizing individual responsibility, the rule of law, internationalism, tolerance of one’s adversaries) and an illiberal or romantic nationalism (emphasizing collective guilt, national prerogatives, procedural anti-formalism, and exemplary
justice for outlaws).” [24] In his new
book, Simpson is less...
23.08.23
|
Carl Landauer
|