the literature on transitional
justice. Her diagnosis of law’s foibles, and her proclamation of the potential of collective memory, is sterling. She has the courage to offer some remedial
responses. Her article is a rich base for a
symposium. For me, her piece opens two shutters. The first is architectural. The second is discursive. On architecture: if collective memory is a worthwhile goal, a claim on which Professor Lopez convinces, then why bother to hook it into penal process? Why must the criminal law always hang around, diversified cosmetically with...