In association with the International Commission of Jurists

Search: Affective Justice: Book Symposium: A Response

24 Jul

[ Fabián Raimondo is an Associate Professor of Public International Law at the Faculty of Law of Maastricht University. He has been a member of the Bar of the City of La Plata (Argentina) since 1990 and on the List of Counsel of the International Criminal Court since 2005. He has acted as counsel and advocate for Sudan in three advisory proceedings before the International Court of Justice. Alexandre Skander Galand is an Assistant Professor of International Law at Maastricht University. He has participated in the International Court of Justice...
24.07.25 | and |

23 May

regions, home of the Nasa indigenous people. This marked the first time the JEP charged for environmental harms, expressly stating that “transitional justice is also environmental justice”. Right after the press conference, the two main Nasa indigenous organisations of the Cauca (ACIN, CRIC) convened an internal emergency meeting with Nasa indigenous authorities to discuss this decision. During the meeting, Nasa representatives heavily criticized the decision for having discarded their cosmovision and own laws (derecho proprio) and reduced Uma Kiwe, their Mother Earth, to natural resources. For the Nasa people, territory...
23.05.23 | |

09 Feb

...is easier than prosecuting them. Britain prefers outsourcing the prosecution to Third World states. Yet if international justice and universal jurisdiction fails here, it will be hard to take it seriously elsewhere. Thus members of the international naval force should themselves bring the offenders they catch to justice. Some of the difficulties can be addressed by shipboard court-martials, or by bringing to Kenya the precedent of the special court created to try Libyan agents in Lockerbie air bombing: Scottish judges held court in a base in Holland designated part of...
09.02.09 | |

07 Feb

case is actively trying) only and handful of the most responsible perpetrators in their respective jurisdictional contexts. None of the over 121,000 alleged war criminals awaiting prosecution in Ukrainian prisons are accused of being such ‘most responsible’ perpetrators. Arguing in favor of a High War Crimes Court, PILPG experts posit that an extraordinary national tribunal can close the accountability gap for international crimes in Ukraine by “provid[ing] an important additional venue for prosecuting the large number of mid-level perpetrators who might otherwise escape justice.” Discourse on international justice mechanisms for...
07.02.24 | |

15 May

...justice system where cases often took years to resolve. In 2009, after decades of effort, the UN comprehensively redesigned its internal justice system, creating the UNDT and the UNAT. For a discussion, see an earlier article by the author here. So, is the redesigned system working? The Kompass case is a prime example that while much more needs to be done, progress has been made. What did the UNDT decide in the Kompass case? Bearing in mind that the merits of the case have not yet been determined, on the...
15.05.15 | |

24 Oct

We’re pleased this week to host a discussion of Ruti Teitel’s new book, Humanity’s Law, just out from Oxford University Press. Ruti is Ernst C. Stiefel Professor of Comparative Law at New York Law School, where she directs the Institute for Global Law, Justice, & Policy. She is also Visiting Professor, London School of Economics. The book is a major contribution to understanding the transformed baselines of international law, an integrated account of how international law has reoriented to humanity. The book describes the central transformations of the post-Cold War...
24.10.11 | |

28 Jul

We are pleased to host this week a discussion of Benjamin Wittes’ book Law and the Long War. Ben’s book is a comprehensive analysis of how September 11th did–and did not–change National Security Law, the disparate group of legal mechanisms related to counter-terrorism. It is also about what the role of law in counter-terrorism should be. It is a book that is sure to ignite debate from all around. As Ben writes: [T]his is a critique of the Bush administration, whose consistent — sometimes mindless — aggressiveness and fixation on...
28.07.08 | |

26 Mar

...Act, etc. They also found that the number of responses to a fictitious issue was affected by the presence of a "don’t know" response category. Providing a "don't know" choice significantly reduced the number of meaningless responses." Friedman, H.H. & Amoo, T. (Winter, 1999) Rating the Rating Scales, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 9:3, 114-123. Retrieved from http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/economic/friedman/rateratingscales.htm Akiva In other words, Dill's methodological approach forced an appearance of certainty on her results that simply may not exist in the real world. Indeed, it would be far more meaningful to...
26.03.15 | |

10 Jan

presupposes transnational justice. [....] Even states with exemplary legal systems for the domestic protection of human rights have a moral obligation, grounded in the Natural Duty of Justice, to support a global legal system that includes principles of transnational justice as far as these are required for normativized, justice-based practice of state recognition, even if that system contributes nothing more to the protection of human rights within their own borders. More generally, even the most just states ought to support a regime of transnational justice that encourages less just states...
10.01.07 | |

30 Mar

recent role on the UN special panel promoting access to justice for the poor. (For those who missed Jeffrey Toobin’s excellent profile of Justice Kennedy the internationalist in the New Yorker last fall, here is the link.) So why Darfur? Kennedy was careful not to make explicit criticisms of the US government’s policies toward Darfur. And when an audience member asked whether the use of military force under the rubric of humanitarian intervention would be a lawful in response to genocide, he replied simply that he would need to think...
30.03.06 | |

22 Jul

...of Harvard and Eric Posner of U.Chicago, both who are not traditional liberal internationalists. But citing their book is simply not any crazier than, say, citing Anne Marie Slaughter’s recent book A New World Order, which can be viewed as controversial in its own right. Peggy McGuinness Julian--Good to hear from you from parts beyond. I agree with many of your comments, and I cannot speak for Oona Hathaway, but I assume when she calls the Goldsmith/Posner book "controversial," she is revealing her own disagreement with either its premises or...
22.07.05 | |

02 Oct

argument that I think are worth highlighting. One is the prominent role played for several Justices by the assumption that piracy was intended to be within the scope of the ATS. Justice Breyer, for example, posited (at p. 26) that an analogy to piracy supports extending a cause of action to overseas human rights violations, observing that “the question to me is who are today’s pirates? And if Hitler isn’t a pirate, who is?” And Justices Scalia (p. 24-25), Chief Justice Roberts (p. 25), Justice Sotomayor (p. 33), and Justice...
02.10.12 | |