the
book that Marty criticizes is not, as he suggests in a good-natured attempt to defend me from my own work, the predations of a publisher keen to sell more
books. It is, rather, the core of the
book, from which the rest sprung. The
book began with an essay in Policy Review a year ago dealing with judicial review and the war on terror–precisely the section of the
book that Marty and Deborah now regard as most problematic. The effort to flesh out that essay led me to the...